ILCS » Chapter 430 · Act 65
Illinois Compiled Statutes

430 ILCS 65/11 (2026)

Judicial review of final administrative decisions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(430 ILCS 65/11) (from Ch. 38, par. 83-11)
    Sec. 11. Judicial review of final administrative decisions.
    (a) All final administrative decisions of the Firearm Owner's Identification Card Review Board under this Act, including final administrative decisions of the Firearm Owner's Identification Card Review Board made under the expedited review process established under paragraph (5) of subsection (c-5) of Section 10 of this Act, except final administrative decisions of the Firearm Owner's Identification Card Review Board to deny a person's application for relief under subsection (f) of Section 10 of this Act, shall be subject to judicial review under the provisions of the Administrative Review Law, and all amendments and modifications thereof, and the rules adopted pursuant thereto. The term "administrative decision" is defined as in Section 3-101 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Illinois State Police or the individual seeking expedited relief may seek judicial review upon receipt of a final administrative decision under paragraph (5) of subsection (c-5) of Section 10 of this Act.
    (b) Any final administrative decision by the Firearm Owner's Identification Card Review Board to deny a person's application for relief under subsection (f) of Section 10 of this Act is subject to de novo judicial review by the circuit court, and any party may offer evidence that is otherwise proper and admissible without regard to whether that evidence is part of the administrative record.
    (c) The Firearm Owner's Identification Card Review Board shall submit a report to the General Assembly on March 1 of each year, beginning March 1, 1991, listing all final decisions by a court of this State upholding, reversing, or reversing in part any administrative decision made by the Firearm Owner's Identification Card Review Board.
(Source: P.A. 104-5, eff. 6-16-25.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2004–2019 · leading case: Williams v. Tazewell Cnty. State's Attorney's Off., 810 N.E.2d 532 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Williams v. Tazewell Cnty. State's Attorney's Off., 810 N.E.2d 532 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 5× “” 430 ILCS 65/11 (West 2002). II. ANALYSIS On appeal, the ISP argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion to vacate because the trial court’s order directing the ISP to issue Williams a FOID card was void for lack of both personal and subject matter jurisdiction.”
People v. Mosley, 2015 IL 115872 (Ill. 2015). “31, 2013)), and the Director’s decisions are subject to judicial review (430 ILCS 65/11 (West 2012)). These provisions demonstrate that it is not impossible for a person under the age of 21 to obtain a FOID card without his or her parents’ permission or signature.”
People v. Mosley, 2015 IL 115872 (Ill. 2015). “31, 2013)) and the Director’s decisions are subject to judicial review (430 ILCS 65/11 (West 2012)). These provisions demonstrate that it is not impossible for a person under the age of 21 to obtain a FOID card without his or her parents’ permission or signature.”
O'Neill v. Dir. of the Illinois Dep't of State Police, 2015 IL App (3d) 140011 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “” 430 ILCS 65/11(a) (West 2012). ¶ 19 Here, the revocation of O’Neill’s FOID card was based on his battery conviction arising out of a domestic violence incident.”
Fuller v. Dep't of State Police, 2019 IL App (1st) 173148 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “Section 3-103 of the Law states that "[e]very action to review a final administrative decision shall be commenced by the filing of a complaint and the issuance of summons within 35 days from the date that a copy of the decision *** was served upon the party affected by the…”
Fuller v. Dep't of State Police, 2019 IL App (1st) 173148 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “” 430 ILCS 65/11(a) (West 2016). Section 3-103 of the Law states that “[e]very action to review a final administrative decision shall be commenced by the filing of a complaint and the issuance of summons within 35 days from the date that a copy of the decision *** was served…”
Williams v. Tazewell Cnty. State's Attorney's Off. (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 5× “" 430 ILCS 65/11 (West 2002). II. ANALYSIS On appeal, the ISP argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion to vacate because the trial court’s order directing the ISP to issue Williams a FOID card was void for lack of both personal and subject matter jurisdiction.”
— 430 ILCS 65/11(a) — 3 cases
O'Neill v. Dir. of the Illinois Dep't of State Police, 2015 IL App (3d) 140011 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “” 430 ILCS 65/11(a) (West 2012). ¶ 19 Here, the revocation of O’Neill’s FOID card was based on his battery conviction arising out of a domestic violence incident.”
Fuller v. Dep't of State Police, 2019 IL App (1st) 173148 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “Section 3-103 of the Law states that "[e]very action to review a final administrative decision shall be commenced by the filing of a complaint and the issuance of summons within 35 days from the date that a copy of the decision *** was served upon the party affected by the…”
Fuller v. Dep't of State Police, 2019 IL App (1st) 173148 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “” 430 ILCS 65/11(a) (West 2016). Section 3-103 of the Law states that “[e]very action to review a final administrative decision shall be commenced by the filing of a complaint and the issuance of summons within 35 days from the date that a copy of the decision *** was served…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.