ILCS » Chapter 5 · Act 140
Illinois Compiled Statutes

5 ILCS 140/8 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(5 ILCS 140/8)
    Sec. 8. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 85-1357. Repealed by P.A. 96-542, eff. 1-1-10.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2007–2012 · leading case: Gekas v. Williamson, 912 N.E.2d 347 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gekas v. Williamson, 912 N.E.2d 347 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). · cites it 6× “Pursuant to section 8 (5 ILCS 140/8 (West 2006)), the court shall allow the redaction of exempt information.”
Stern v. Wheaton-Warrenville Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. 200, 910 N.E.2d 85 (Ill. 2009). · cites it 3× “3d at 507 , citing 5 ILCS 140/8 (West 2004). The statutory interpretation and analysis of section 7(1) (b) set forth in Reppert is persuasive and provides this court guidance in determining the appropriate treatment of employment contracts under FOIA.”
Watkins v. McCarthy, 2012 IL App (1st) 100632 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). · cites it 2× “See 5 ILCS 140/8 (West 2008); Stern, 233 Ill.”
Reppert v. S. Illinois Univ., 874 N.E.2d 905 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 2× “” 5 ILCS 140/8 (West 2004). C. Plaintiffs’ Claim That the Trial Court Erred by Granting Summary Judgment in Defendants’ Favor as to Count II Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment in defendants’ favor as to count II.”
Stern v. Wheaton-Warrenville Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. 200, 894 N.E.2d 818 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “In addition, section 8 of the FOIA provides as follows: “If any public record that is exempt from disclosure under [section 7 of this Act contains any material which is not exempt, the public body shall delete the information which is exempt and make the remaining information…”
Reppert v. S. Illinois Univ. (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 2× “" 5 ILCS 140/8 (West 2004). C. Plaintiffs' Claim That the Trial Court Erred by Granting Summary Judgment in Defendants' Favor as to Count II Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment in defendants' favor as to count II.”
Stern v. Wheaton-Warrenville Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. 200 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “" 5 ILCS 140/8 (West 2004). "When a public body receives a proper request for information, it must comply with that request unless one of the narrow statutory exemptions applies.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.