ILCS » Chapter 5 · Act 75
Illinois Compiled Statutes

5 ILCS 75/2 (2026)

Bills passed after May 31

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(5 ILCS 75/2) (from Ch. 1, par. 1202)
    Sec. 2. Bills passed after May 31. A bill passed after May 31 of a calendar year shall become effective on June 1 of the next calendar year unless the General Assembly by a vote of three-fifths of the members elected to each house provides for an earlier effective date in the terms of the bill or unless the General Assembly provides for a later effective date in the terms of the bill; provided that if the effective date provided in the terms of the bill is prior to the date the bill becomes a law then the date the bill becomes a law shall be the effective date.
(Source: P.A. 88-597, eff. 11-28-94.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1998–2017 · leading case: People ex rel. Alvarez v. Howard, 2016 IL 120729 (Ill. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People ex rel. Alvarez v. Howard, 2016 IL 120729 (Ill. 2016). “” 5 ILCS 75/2 (West 2014). See also Ill. Const.”
Orr v. Edgar, 698 N.E.2d 560 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). · cites it 2× “" 5 ILCS 75/2 (West 1996). Plaintiffs maintain that the 89th General Assembly had only two opportunities to pass the Act with a simple majority and an immediate effective date: from January 11, 1995, to May 31, 1995, and from January 10, 1996, to May 31, 1996.”
People ex rel. Alvarez v. Howard, 2016 IL 120729 (Ill. 2017). “” 5 ILCS 75/2 (West 2014). See also Ill. Const.”
People ex rel. Alvarez v. Howard, 2016 IL 120729 (Ill. 2016). “” 5 ILCS 75/2 (West 2014). See also Ill. Const.”
Orr v. Edgar (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “" 5 ILCS 75/2 (West 1996). Plaintiffs maintain that the 89th General Assembly had only two opportunities to pass the Act with a simple majority and an immediate effective date: from January 11, 1995, to May 31, 1995, and from January 10, 1996, to May 31, 1996.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.