ILCS » Chapter 55 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(55 ILCS 5/3-4012)
    Sec. 3-4012. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 97-673, eff. 6-1-12. Repealed by P.A. 100-987, eff. 7-1-19.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases, 2015–2019 · leading case: People v. Camacho, 2016 IL App (1st) 140604, 64 N.E.3d 647.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Camacho, 2016 IL App (1st) 140604, 64 N.E.3d 647. · cites it 4× “1(c) (West 2012)), and a $2 public defender records automation assessment (55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (West 2012)). ¶ 45 Although Camacho failed to raise the propriety of his assessments in the trial court, a reviewing court may modify a fines and fees order without remand.”
People v. Maxey, 2016 IL App (1st) 130698, 57 N.E.3d 726. · cites it 2× “¶ 142 Defendant also argues that the assessments of $2 each for the Public Defender Records Automation fee (55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (West 2010)) and the State's Attorney Records Automation fee (55 ILCS 5/4-2002(a) (West 2010)) were error because the charges amounted to fines imposed in…”
People v. Clark, 2018 IL 122495. · cites it 6× “The Cook County circuit court also imposed several monetary charges, including a $2 Public Defender Records Automation Fund charge (55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (West 2014)), a $2 State’s Attorney Records Automation Fund charge (id.”
People v. Camacho, 2016 IL App (1st) 140604. · cites it 4× “1(c) (West 2012)), and a $2 public defender records automation assessment (55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (West 2012)). ¶ 45 Although Camacho failed to raise the propriety of his assessments in the trial court, a reviewing court may modify a fines and fees order without remand.”
People v. Clark, 2018 IL 122495, 129 N.E.3d 1124. · cites it 8× “The Cook County circuit court also imposed several monetary charges, including a $2 Public Defender Records Automation Fund charge ( 55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (West 2014) ), a $2 State's Attorney Records Automation Fund charge ( id.”
People v. Johnson, 2019 IL App (1st) 161104, 153 N.E.3d 156. “2a(w)(1)(A) (West 2014)), the $2 Public Defender Records Automation Fund charge (55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (West 2014)), the $2 State’s Attorney Records Automation Fund charge (id.”
People v. Maxey, 2018 IL App (1st) 130698-B. · cites it 2× “¶ 128 Defendant also argues that the assessments of $2 each for the public defender records automation fee (55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (West 2012)) and the state’s attorney records automation fee (55 ILCS 5/4-2002(a) (West 2012)) were error because the charges amounted to fines imposed in…”
People v. Mullen, 2018 IL App (1st) 152306, 100 N.E.3d 532. · cites it 3× “), a $2 public defender records automation fee ( 55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (West 2014) ), a $2 state's attorney records automation fee (id.”
People v. Brown, 2017 IL App (1st) 142877. · cites it 2× “1(c) (West 2012)) and public defender records automation fee (55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (West 2012)). Defendant contends these charges are fines.”
People v. Bowen, 2015 IL App (1st) 132046, 38 N.E.3d 98. “See 55 ILCS 5/3-4012, 4-2002.1(c) (West 2012).”
People v. Jones, 2017 IL App (1st) 143766, 81 N.E.3d 48. “5) (West 2014)); a $2 Public Defender Automation Fee pursuant to section 3­ 4012 of the Counties Code (55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (West 2014)); a $2 State’s Attorney Records Automation fee pursuant to section 4-2002.”
People v. Smith, 2018 IL App (1st) 151402, 97 N.E.3d 117. “¶ 16 Similarly, Smith is not entitled to presentence custody credit against the $2 Public Defender Records Automation Fund fee ( 55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (West 2014) ) and $2 State's Attorney Records Automation Fund fee ( id.”
Show all 34 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.