70 ILCS 705/0.01
Short title
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(70 ILCS 705/0.01)
(from Ch. 127 1/2, par. 20.9)
Sec. 0.01.
Short title.
This Act may be cited as the
Fire Protection District Act.
(Source: P.A. 86-1324.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1994–2017 · leading case: Gaffney v. Board of Trustees of the Orland Fire Protection District
Gaffney v. Board of Trustees of the Orland Fire Protection District (2012)
“As for the remaining count seeking administrative review, the trial court ruled that the Administrative Review Law did not apply because it was not expressly adopted by the Fire Protection District Act (70 ILCS 705/0.01 et seq. (West 2006)). The trial court noted that the…”
Gaffney v. ORLAND FIRE PROTECTION DIST. (2012)
“As for the remaining count seeking administrative review, the trial court ruled that the Administrative Review Law did not apply because it was not expressly adopted by the Fire Protection District Act (70 ILCS 705/0.01 et seq. (West 2006)). The trial court noted that the…”
Pederson v. Village of Hoffman Estates (2014)
“The court’s review of the Fire Protection District Act (70 ILCS 705/0.01 et seq. (West 2010)) revealed no provision indicating that the legislature intended the board’s denial of section 10 benefits to be an administrative decision subject to administrative review.”
Englum v. City of Charleston (2017)
“Gaffney ¶ 49 In Gaffney, the Board of the Orland Fire Protection District (see Fire Protection District Act (70 ILCS 705/0.01 to 26 (West 2012))) passed an ordinance establishing an administrative procedure to determine Orland Park firefighters’ eligibility for benefits under…”
Orland Fire Protection District v. Intrastate Piping & Controls, Inc. (1994)
“31 (now 70 ILCS 705/11 (West 1992) and now cited as the Fire Protection District Act (70 ILCS 705/0.01 (West 1992)))). Defendant acknowledges that the validity of the ordinance was not raised in the trial court but believes that this issue is properly before this court because a…”
Englum v. The City of Charleston (2017)
“But two cases have ad- dressed the related issues of whether a fire protection unit and a home-rule municipality, respec- tively, have the authority to establish such procedures. We summarize those two cases, as fol- lows.”
Frakes v. Elba-Salem Fire Protection, District (2016)
“70 ILCS 705/0.01 et seq., 705/6. The volunteer firemen are paid between $2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|