ILCS » Chapter 705 · Act 105
Illinois Compiled Statutes

705 ILCS 105/27.2 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 105/27.2) (from Ch. 25, par. 27.2)
    Sec. 27.2. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 100-863, eff. 8-14-18. Repealed by P.A. 100-987, eff. 7-1-19.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case: People v. Carter, 877 N.E.2d 446 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Carter, 877 N.E.2d 446 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 3× “00 for filing a petition to vacate, modify, or reconsider final judgment pursuant to 705 ILCS 105/27.2(a) (West 2004). In satisfaction of this assessment, the Illinois Department of Corrections shall collect a first time payment of 50% of the average monthly balance of…”
People v. Pohl, 969 N.E.2d 508 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). · cites it 2× “2(w) of the Clerks of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.2(w) (West 2008)) dictates the costs and fees that must be assessed in criminal and quasi-criminal cases.”
People v. Gale, 876 N.E.2d 171 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “00 in mailing fees, pursuant to 705 ILCS 105/27.2(a) (West 2004).” ANALYSIS On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing his postconviction petition because it stated the gist of a constitutional claim entitling him to relief.”
People v. Wynn, 2013 IL App (2d) 120575 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “2(gg) of the Clerks of Court Act (705 ILCS 105/27.2(gg) (West 2010)) permits the imposition of a delinquency fee.”
Grant-Hall v. Cavalry Portfolio Servs., LLC, 856 F. Supp. 2d 929 (N.D. Ill. 2012). “See 705 ILCS 105/27.2(e); 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(e).”
People v. Pohl, 2012 IL App (2d) 100629 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “2(w) of the Clerks of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.2(w) (West 2008)) dictates the costs and fees that must be assessed in criminal and quasi-criminal cases.”
People v. Gale, 876 N.E.2d 171 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “00 in mailing fees, pursuant to 705 ILCS 105/27.2(a) (West 2004)." ANALYSIS On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing his postconviction petition because it stated the gist of a constitutional claim entitling him to relief.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “1a(w) $40-$100 county) 705 ILCS 105/27.2(w) 500,000-3,000,000 CF= $80-$125 705 ILCS 105/27.”
People v. Avery, 2012 IL App (1st) 110298 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “The trial court in this case imposed a total of $545 in fines and fees against the defendant, including: (1) $190 for a felony complaint filed (see 705 ILCS 105/27.2(a)(w)(1)(A) (West 2004)); (2) $60 for a felony complaint conviction (see 55 ILCS 5/4-2002.”
Kaden v. Kagann, 635 N.E.2d 515 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). · cites it 2× “JUSTICE QUETSCH delivered the opinion of the court: The plaintiff, Barbara Kaden, brought a four-count class action complaint on behalf of Illinois taxpayers seeking to enjoin Joel Kagann, the clerk of the 18th Judicial Circuit (Du Page County), from turning over to the Du Page…”
Gassman v. Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook Cnty., 2017 IL App (1st) 151738 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “705 ILCS 105/27.2(g) (West 2010). -6- Cook Co.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “1a(w) 180,000- 500,000 CF= $40-$100 size of 500,000-3,000,000 705 ILCS 105/27.2(w) CF= $80-$125 county) 705 ILCS 105/27.”
Show all 17 citing cases →
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2(a) — 4 cases
People v. Carter, 877 N.E.2d 446 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “00 for filing a petition to vacate, modify, or reconsider final judgment pursuant to 705 ILCS 105/27.2(a) (West 2004). In satisfaction of this assessment, the Illinois Department of Corrections shall collect a first time payment of 50% of the average monthly balance of…”
People v. Gale, 876 N.E.2d 171 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “00 in mailing fees, pursuant to 705 ILCS 105/27.2(a) (West 2004).” ANALYSIS On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing his postconviction petition because it stated the gist of a constitutional claim entitling him to relief.”
People v. Gale, 876 N.E.2d 171 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “00 in mailing fees, pursuant to 705 ILCS 105/27.2(a) (West 2004)." ANALYSIS On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing his postconviction petition because it stated the gist of a constitutional claim entitling him to relief.”
People v. Gardner, 2025 IL App (1st) 240753-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2025).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2(a)(w)(1)(A) — 1 case
People v. Avery, 2012 IL App (1st) 110298 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “The trial court in this case imposed a total of $545 in fines and fees against the defendant, including: (1) $190 for a felony complaint filed (see 705 ILCS 105/27.2(a)(w)(1)(A) (West 2004)); (2) $60 for a felony complaint conviction (see 55 ILCS 5/4-2002.”
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2(e) — 1 case
Grant-Hall v. Cavalry Portfolio Servs., LLC, 856 F. Supp. 2d 929 (N.D. Ill. 2012). “See 705 ILCS 105/27.2(e); 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(e).”
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2(g) — 2 cases
Gassman v. Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook Cnty., 2017 IL App (1st) 151738 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “705 ILCS 105/27.2(g) (West 2010). -6- Cook Co.”
Morris v. Weinstein, 2021 IL App (2d) 200512-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2(g)(1) — 1 case
Morris v. Weinstein, 2021 IL App (2d) 200512-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2(gg) — 1 case
People v. Wynn, 2013 IL App (2d) 120575 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “2(gg) of the Clerks of Court Act (705 ILCS 105/27.2(gg) (West 2010)) permits the imposition of a delinquency fee.”
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2(w) — 5 cases
People v. Pohl, 2012 IL App (2d) 100629 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “2(w) of the Clerks of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.2(w) (West 2008)) dictates the costs and fees that must be assessed in criminal and quasi-criminal cases.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “1a(w) $40-$100 county) 705 ILCS 105/27.2(w) 500,000-3,000,000 CF= $80-$125 705 ILCS 105/27.”
People v. Pohl, 969 N.E.2d 508 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “2(w) of the Clerks of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.2(w) (West 2008)) dictates the costs and fees that must be assessed in criminal and quasi-criminal cases.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “1a(w) 180,000- 500,000 CF= $40-$100 size of 500,000-3,000,000 705 ILCS 105/27.2(w) CF= $80-$125 county) 705 ILCS 105/27.”
People v. Martino, 2012 IL App (1st) 101244 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2(w)(1)(B) — 1 case
People v. Pohl, 969 N.E.2d 508 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “2(w) of the Clerks of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.2(w) (West 2008)) dictates the costs and fees that must be assessed in criminal and quasi-criminal cases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.