ILCS » Chapter 705 · Act 105
Illinois Compiled Statutes

705 ILCS 105/27.3c (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 105/27.3c) (from Ch. 25, par. 27.3c)
    Sec. 27.3c. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 98-606, eff. 6-1-14. Repealed by P.A. 100-987, eff. 7-1-19.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases, 2000–2019 · leading case: Pucinski v. Cnty. of Cook, 737 N.E.2d 225 (Ill. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pucinski v. Cnty. of Cook, 737 N.E.2d 225 (Ill. 2000). · cites it 6× “3c of the Clerks of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.3c (West 1998)). It was funded by court document fees charged and collected by the clerk of the circuit court to defray the expense of establishing and maintaining a document storage system in the circuit clerk’s office.”
People v. Clark, 2018 IL 122495 (Ill. 2019). · cites it 3× “1(c)), a $15 Court Document Storage Fund charge (705 ILCS 105/27.3c (West 2014)), a $190 “Felony Complaint Filed, (Clerk)” charge (id.”
People v. Clark, 2018 IL 122495 (Ill. 2018). · cites it 4× “1(c) ), a $15 Court Document Storage Fund charge ( 705 ILCS 105/27.3c (West 2014) ), a $190 "Felony Complaint Filed, (Clerk)" charge ( id.”
People v. Larue, 2014 IL App (4th) 120595 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “3c(a) of the Clerks of Courts Act (Clerks Act) (705 ILCS 105/27.3c(a) (West 2010)) authorizes the clerk to charge a fee of between $1 and $15, which "shall be paid *** by the defendant in any felony, misdemeanor, traffic, ordinance, or - 19 - conservation matter.”
People v. Brown, 2017 IL App (1st) 150146 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “3a(1) (West 2012)); the $15 document storage charge (705 ILCS 105/27.3c (West 2012)); and the $25 court services charge (55 ILCS 5/5-1103 (West 2012)).”
People v. Brown, 2017 IL App (1st) 142877 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 705 ILCS 105/27.3c(a) (West 2012). ¶ 81 This court has found that the automation and document storage charges are fees because they “are compensatory and a collateral consequence” of a conviction.”
People v. Robinson, 2017 IL App (1st) 161595 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “The $15 difference can be explained by the fact that, on remand, the trial court did not reenter a $15 document storage fee ( 705 ILCS 105/27.3c (West 2010) ) on the new fines and fees order.”
People v. Brown, 2017 IL App (1st) 150146 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “3a(1) (West 2012)); the $15 document storage charge (705 ILCS 105/27.3c (West 2012)); and the $25 court services charge (55 ILCS 5/5-1103 (West 2012)).”
People v. Barr, 2019 IL App (1st) 163035 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “3a(1) (West 2014)); the $25 Document Storage fee (705 ILCS 105/27.3c(a) (West 2014)); the $2 State’s Attorney Records Automation fee (55 ILCS 5/4-2002.”
People v. Carter, 2016 IL App (3d) 140196 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “3a(1) (West 2012)); (4) the $25 judicial security fee (55 ILCS 5/5-1103 (West 2012)); (5) the $15 document storage fee (705 ILCS 105/27.3c(a) (West 2012)); and (6) the $2 State’s Attorney automation fee (55 ILCS 5/4-2002(a) (West 2012)).”
People v. Larue, 2014 IL App (4th) 120595 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “3c(a) of the Clerks of Courts Act (Clerks Act) (705 ILCS 105/27.3c(a) (West 2010)) authorizes the clerk to charge a fee of between $1 and $15, which “shall be paid *** by the defendant in any felony, misdemeanor, traffic, ordinance, or conservation matter.”
SEYLLER v. Cnty. of Kane, 946 N.E.2d 923 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 2× “705 ILCS 105/27.3c(a) (West 2008). The circuit clerk collects a fee for this fund and remits the fees to the county treasurer.”
Show all 27 citing cases →
— 705 ILCS 105/27.3c(a) — 13 cases
People v. Larue, 2014 IL App (4th) 120595 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “3c(a) of the Clerks of Courts Act (Clerks Act) (705 ILCS 105/27.3c(a) (West 2010)) authorizes the clerk to charge a fee of between $1 and $15, which "shall be paid *** by the defendant in any felony, misdemeanor, traffic, ordinance, or - 19 - conservation matter.”
People v. Brown, 2017 IL App (1st) 142877 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 705 ILCS 105/27.3c(a) (West 2012). ¶ 81 This court has found that the automation and document storage charges are fees because they “are compensatory and a collateral consequence” of a conviction.”
People v. Barr, 2019 IL App (1st) 163035 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “3a(1) (West 2014)); the $25 Document Storage fee (705 ILCS 105/27.3c(a) (West 2014)); the $2 State’s Attorney Records Automation fee (55 ILCS 5/4-2002.”
People v. Carter, 2016 IL App (3d) 140196 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “3a(1) (West 2012)); (4) the $25 judicial security fee (55 ILCS 5/5-1103 (West 2012)); (5) the $15 document storage fee (705 ILCS 105/27.3c(a) (West 2012)); and (6) the $2 State’s Attorney automation fee (55 ILCS 5/4-2002(a) (West 2012)).”
People v. Larue, 2014 IL App (4th) 120595 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “3c(a) of the Clerks of Courts Act (Clerks Act) (705 ILCS 105/27.3c(a) (West 2010)) authorizes the clerk to charge a fee of between $1 and $15, which “shall be paid *** by the defendant in any felony, misdemeanor, traffic, ordinance, or conservation matter.”
— 705 ILCS 105/27.3c(c) — 6 cases
Pucinski v. Cnty. of Cook, 737 N.E.2d 225 (Ill. 2000). “3c of the Clerks of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.3c (West 1998)). It was funded by court document fees charged and collected by the clerk of the circuit court to defray the expense of establishing and maintaining a document storage system in the circuit clerk’s office.”
People v. Clark, 2018 IL 122495 (Ill. 2019). “1(c)), a $15 Court Document Storage Fund charge (705 ILCS 105/27.3c (West 2014)), a $190 “Felony Complaint Filed, (Clerk)” charge (id.”
People v. Clark, 2018 IL 122495 (Ill. 2018). “1(c) ), a $15 Court Document Storage Fund charge ( 705 ILCS 105/27.3c (West 2014) ), a $190 "Felony Complaint Filed, (Clerk)" charge ( id.”
SEYLLER v. Cnty. of Kane, 946 N.E.2d 923 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “705 ILCS 105/27.3c(a) (West 2008). The circuit clerk collects a fee for this fund and remits the fees to the county treasurer.”
People v. Breeden, 2014 IL App (4th) 121049 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.