ILCS » Chapter 705 · Act 105
Illinois Compiled Statutes

705 ILCS 105/27.3e (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 105/27.3e)
    Sec. 27.3e. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 97-402, eff. 8-16-11. Repealed by P.A. 100-987, eff. 7-1-19.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases, 2014–2020 · leading case: People v. Gonzalez, 2019 IL App (1st) 152760 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Gonzalez, 2019 IL App (1st) 152760 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “¶ 93 Defendant first contends, and the State correctly concedes, that the $5 electronic citation fee (705 ILCS 105/27.3e (West 2014)) was improperly assessed.”
People v. McGee, 2015 IL App (1st) 130367 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “See 705 ILCS 105/27.3e (West 2012) (a $5 fee “shall be paid by the defendant in any traffic, misdemeanor, municipal ordinance, or conservation case”).”
People v. Contursi, 2019 IL App (1st) 162894 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “705 ILCS 105/27.3e (West 2014). A defendant already in the DNA database cannot be ordered to pay another DNA fee.”
People v. Maxey, 2016 IL App (1st) 130698 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “" 705 ILCS 105/27.3e (West 2010). Defendant's remaining residential burglary conviction is a felony and does not fall under section 27.”
People v. Curry, 2018 IL App (1st) 152616 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “705 ILCS 105/27.3e (West 2012). He further claims that the court failed to offset *491 the $15 state police operations fee and $50 court system fee by the 642 days that he spent in presentence custody.”
People v. Jackson, 2018 IL App (1st) 150487 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “Defendant should have been credited with 1287 days of presentence credit. We correct the mittimus to so reflect.”
People v. Gomez, 2018 IL App (1st) 150605 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 4× “He first argues, and the State agrees, that he was improperly assessed a $5 electronic citation fee ( 705 ILCS 105/27.3e (West 2014) ), a $5 court system fee ( 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(a) (West 2014) ) and a $100 streetgang fine ( 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.”
People v. Burlington, 2018 IL App (4th) 150642 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “" Thus, we agree with the parties the $5 electronic citation fee does not apply to defendant's criminal conviction and vacate the fee.”
People v. Barr, 2019 IL App (1st) 163035 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 2× “¶ 17 The parties correctly agree that the $5 Electronic Citation fee (705 ILCS 105/27.3e (West 2014)); the $5 Court Systems fee (55 ILCS 5/5-1101(a) (West 2014)); and the $250 DNA ID Systems fee (730 ILCS 5/5-4-3(j) (West 2014)) should be vacated.”
People v. Gomez, 2018 IL App (1st) 150605 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 4× “He first argues, and the State agrees, that he was improperly assessed a $5 electronic citation fee (705 ILCS 105/27.3e ( West 2014 )), a $5 court system fee (55 ILCS 5/5-1101(a) ( West 2014 )), and a $100 streetgang fine (730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.”
People v. Woods, 2018 IL App (1st) 153323 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “Woods first asserts, and the State correctly concedes, that the $250 DNA fee (730 ILCS 5/5-4-3(j) (West 2012)), the $5 electronic citation fee (705 ILCS 105/27.3e (West 2012)), the $100 trauma fund fine (730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.”
People v. Smith, 2018 IL App (1st) 151402 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “We are also sending a copy of the decision to Kim Foxx, the State's Attorney of Cook County; James E.”
Show all 34 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.