ILCS » Chapter 705 · Act 405
Illinois Compiled Statutes

705 ILCS 405/5-33 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 405/5-33) (from Ch. 37, par. 805-33)
    Sec. 5-33. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 88-680, eff. 1-1-95. Repealed by P.A. 90-590, eff. 1-1-99.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 1993–2011 · leading case: In Re Fg, 743 N.E.2d 181 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Fg, 743 N.E.2d 181 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). · cites it 6× “The circuit court committed defendant to the custody of the Department of Corrections, Juvenile Division, until his 21st birthday, pursuant to Public Act 88-680, commonly known as the Safe Neighborhoods Act (705 ILCS 405/5-33(1.”
In re Jonathon C.B., 2011 IL 107750 (Ill. 2011). “” See 705 ILCS 405/5-33(1.5) (West 1996). In re G.”
In Re Jonathon CB, 958 N.E.2d 227 (Ill. 2011). “" See 705 ILCS 405/5-33(1.5) (West 1996). In re G.”
In Interest of Ec, 696 N.E.2d 846 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). · cites it 2× “" 705 ILCS 405/5-33(2) (West 1996). The trial court may enter a dispositional order committing a delinquent minor to DOC consistent with section 5-33 of the Act if the minor is 13 years of age or older and a term of incarceration is permitted by law for adults found guilty of…”
In Interest of LJ, 654 N.E.2d 671 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). · cites it 2× “is transferred to the general adult criminal division of the circuit court for prosecution and convicted and sentenced to imprisonment, he may still be confined in the Juvenile Division of the Department of Corrections.”
People v. Jonathan C.B., 898 N.E.2d 252 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “One must bear in mind the argument the respondent was making in that case. He argued that denying him a jury trial violated due process because the mandatory minimum sentence required by section 5-33(1.”
In Re Jjm, 701 N.E.2d 1170 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). · cites it 2× “" 705 ILCS 405/5-33(1) (West 1996). The commitment of a delinquent to the DOC is for an indeterminate term that automatically terminates "upon the delinquent attaining the age of 21 years unless the delinquent is sooner discharged from parole or custodianship is otherwise…”
In Re Rt, 729 N.E.2d 889 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). · cites it 2× “In a supplemental brief, the respondent also argues that he must be resentenced, because the statute under which he was sentenced (705 ILCS 405/5-33 (1996)), has been found to violate the Illinois Constitution.”
David B. v. Patla, 950 F. Supp. 841 (N.D. Ill. 1996). “See also 705 ILCS 405/5-33(3) (requiring appointment of Assistant Director of Corrections as legal custodian for any minor "committed]" to the DOC).”
In Re Fn, 624 N.E.2d 853 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “805-33(1)(b) (now 705 ILCS 405/5-33(1)(b) (West 1992)).) This court has ordered a new dispositional hearing where the lower court failed to make the requisite findings and such findings could not be implied based on the evidence in the record.”
People v. F.N., 624 N.E.2d 853 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “805-33(l)(b) (now 705 ILCS 405/5-33(l)(b) (West 1992)).) This court has ordered a new dispositional hearing where the lower court failed to make the requisite findings and such findings could not be implied based on the evidence in the record.”
In Re Go, 727 N.E.2d 1003 (Ill. 2000). · cites it 7× “5) of the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 (705 ILCS 405/5-33(1.5) (West 1996) (now 705 ILCS 405/5-750(2) (West 1998))), the trial court declared respondent a ward of the court and ordered him committed to the Department of Corrections, Juvenile Division, until his "21st birthday,…”
Show all 17 citing cases →
— 705 ILCS 405/5-33(1) — 1 case
In Re Jjm, 701 N.E.2d 1170 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “" 705 ILCS 405/5-33(1) (West 1996). The commitment of a delinquent to the DOC is for an indeterminate term that automatically terminates "upon the delinquent attaining the age of 21 years unless the delinquent is sooner discharged from parole or custodianship is otherwise…”
— 705 ILCS 405/5-33(1)(b) — 2 cases
In Re Fn, 624 N.E.2d 853 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “805-33(1)(b) (now 705 ILCS 405/5-33(1)(b) (West 1992)).) This court has ordered a new dispositional hearing where the lower court failed to make the requisite findings and such findings could not be implied based on the evidence in the record.”
In Re Wc, 633 N.E.2d 956 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994).
— 705 ILCS 405/5-33(2) — 4 cases
In Interest of Ec, 696 N.E.2d 846 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “" 705 ILCS 405/5-33(2) (West 1996). The trial court may enter a dispositional order committing a delinquent minor to DOC consistent with section 5-33 of the Act if the minor is 13 years of age or older and a term of incarceration is permitted by law for adults found guilty of…”
In Interest of LJ, 654 N.E.2d 671 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). “is transferred to the general adult criminal division of the circuit court for prosecution and convicted and sentenced to imprisonment, he may still be confined in the Juvenile Division of the Department of Corrections.”
In Re Jjm, 701 N.E.2d 1170 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “" 705 ILCS 405/5-33(1) (West 1996). The commitment of a delinquent to the DOC is for an indeterminate term that automatically terminates "upon the delinquent attaining the age of 21 years unless the delinquent is sooner discharged from parole or custodianship is otherwise…”
People v. Champ (Ill. App. Ct. 2002).
— 705 ILCS 405/5-33(3) — 1 case
David B. v. Patla, 950 F. Supp. 841 (N.D. Ill. 1996). “See also 705 ILCS 405/5-33(3) (requiring appointment of Assistant Director of Corrections as legal custodian for any minor "committed]" to the DOC).”
— 705 ILCS 405/5-33(l)(b) — 1 case
People v. F.N., 624 N.E.2d 853 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “805-33(l)(b) (now 705 ILCS 405/5-33(l)(b) (West 1992)).) This court has ordered a new dispositional hearing where the lower court failed to make the requisite findings and such findings could not be implied based on the evidence in the record.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.