ILCS » Chapter 720 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

720 ILCS 5/16-16 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(720 ILCS 5/16-16)
    Sec. 16-16. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 97-347, eff. 1-1-12. Repealed by P.A. 97-597, eff. 1-1-12.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2004–2008 · leading case: People v. Hill, 819 N.E.2d 1285 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Hill, 819 N.E.2d 1285 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “Hill, with (1) armed robbery (720 ILCS 5/18-2(a) (West 2002)); (2) possession of a stolen firearm (720 ILCS 5/16-16(a) (West 2002)), (3) reckless discharge of a firearm (720 ILCS 5/24-1.”
People v. Jenkins (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 2× “On appeal, defendant claims that his convictions should be reversed because (1) the indictment was barred by the statute of limitations; (2) the statutes under which he was convicted are ex post facto laws because they impermissibly criminalize conduct and increase penalties for…”
People v. Hill (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “6(a)(3)(A) (West 2002)), (5) resisting a peace officer (720 ILCS 5/31-1 (West 2002)), and (6) battery (720 ILCS 5/12-3(a)(1) (West 2002)).”
— 720 ILCS 5/16-16(a) — 3 cases
People v. Hill, 819 N.E.2d 1285 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “Hill, with (1) armed robbery (720 ILCS 5/18-2(a) (West 2002)); (2) possession of a stolen firearm (720 ILCS 5/16-16(a) (West 2002)), (3) reckless discharge of a firearm (720 ILCS 5/24-1.”
People v. Hill (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “6(a)(3)(A) (West 2002)), (5) resisting a peace officer (720 ILCS 5/31-1 (West 2002)), and (6) battery (720 ILCS 5/12-3(a)(1) (West 2002)).”
People v. Jenkins (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “On appeal, defendant claims that his convictions should be reversed because (1) the indictment was barred by the statute of limitations; (2) the statutes under which he was convicted are ex post facto laws because they impermissibly criminalize conduct and increase penalties for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.