ILCS » Chapter 720 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

720 ILCS 5/36-2.7 (2026)

Innocent owner hearing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(720 ILCS 5/36-2.7)
    Sec. 36-2.7. Innocent owner hearing.
    (a) After a complaint for forfeiture has been filed and all claimants have appeared and answered, a claimant may file a motion with the court for an innocent owner hearing prior to trial. This motion shall be made and supported by sworn affidavit and shall assert the following along with specific facts that support each assertion:
        (1) that the claimant filing the motion is the true
    
owner of the conveyance as interpreted by case law; and
        (2) that the claimant did not know or did not have
    
reason to know the conduct giving rise to the forfeiture was likely to occur.
    The claimant's motion shall include specific facts that support these assertions.
    (b) Upon the filing, a hearing may only be conducted after the parties have been given the opportunity to conduct limited discovery as to the ownership and control of the property, the claimant's knowledge, or any matter relevant to the issues raised or facts alleged in the claimant's motion. Discovery shall be limited to the People's requests in these areas but may proceed by any means allowed in the Code of Civil Procedure.
    (c) After discovery is complete and the court has allowed for sufficient time to review and investigate the discovery responses, the court shall conduct a hearing. At the hearing, the fact that the conveyance is subject to forfeiture shall not be at issue. The court shall only hear evidence relating to the issue of innocent ownership.
    (d) At the hearing on the motion, the claimant shall bear the burden of proving each of the assertions listed in subsection (a) of this Section by a preponderance of the evidence. If a claimant meets the burden of proof, the court shall grant the motion and order the conveyance returned to the claimant. If the claimant fails to meet the burden of proof, the court shall deny the motion and the forfeiture case shall proceed according to the Code of Civil Procedure.
(Source: P.A. 100-512, eff. 7-1-18; 100-699, eff. 8-3-18.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: People v. 2017 Ford Explorer, 2022 IL App (3d) 210368 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. 2017 Ford Explorer, 2022 IL App (3d) 210368 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). · cites it 3× “See 720 ILCS 5/36-2.7 (West 2020). ¶ 16 The “expedited process for innocent owners” is set forth in section 36-2.”
— 720 ILCS 5/36-2.7(a) — 1 case
People v. 2017 Ford Explorer, 2022 IL App (3d) 210368 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “See 720 ILCS 5/36-2.7 (West 2020). ¶ 16 The “expedited process for innocent owners” is set forth in section 36-2.”
— 720 ILCS 5/36-2.7(d) — 1 case
People v. 2017 Ford Explorer, 2022 IL App (3d) 210368 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “See 720 ILCS 5/36-2.7 (West 2020). ¶ 16 The “expedited process for innocent owners” is set forth in section 36-2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.