ILCS » Chapter 730 · Act 154
Illinois Compiled Statutes

730 ILCS 154/11 (2026)

Transfer from the sex offender registry

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(730 ILCS 154/11)
    Sec. 11. Transfer from the sex offender registry.
    (a) The registration information for a person registered under the Sex Offender Registration Act who was convicted or adjudicated for an offense listed in subsection (b) of Section 5 of this Act may only be transferred to the Murderer and Violent Offender Against Youth Registry if all the following conditions are met:
        (1) The offender's sole offense requiring
    
registration was a conviction or adjudication for an offense or offenses listed in subsection (b) of Section 5 of this Act.
        (2) The State's Attorney's Office in the county in
    
which the offender was convicted has verified, on a form prescribed by the Illinois State Police, that the person's crime that required or requires registration was not sexually motivated as defined in Section 10 of the Sex Offender Management Board Act.
        (3) The completed form has been received by the
    
registering law enforcement agency and the Illinois State Police's Sex Offender Registration Unit.
    (b) Transfer under this Section shall not extend the registration period for offenders who were registered under the Sex Offender Registration Act.
(Source: P.A. 97-154, eff. 1-1-12.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2007–2018 · leading case: People v. Johnson, 870 N.E.2d 415 (Ill. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Johnson, 870 N.E.2d 415 (Ill. 2007). · cites it 9× “June 27, 2006 (adding 730 ILCS 154/11), citing 20 ILCS 4026/10 (West 2004).”
People v. Black, 917 N.E.2d 114 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “730 ILCS 154/11 (West 2006). Applying the principles of statutory construction, we conclude that section 2(B)(1.”
People v. McClenton, 2017 IL App (3d) 160387 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “June 27, 2006) (adding 730 ILCS 154/11 ). Yet, the court recognized section 11 of the Violent Offender Against Youth Registration Act gives the State's Attorney's Office in the county in which the offender was convicted the sole discretion to recommend the removal of a convicted…”
People v. Johnson (Ill. 2007). · cites it 5× “June 27, 2006 (adding 730 ILCS 154/11), citing 20 1 Contrary to the State’s suggestion in its reply brief, section 86 of the Violent Offender Against Youth Registration Act provides no relief to the defendant.”
People v. McClenton, 2017 IL App (3d) 160387 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “June 27, 2006) (adding 730 ILCS 154/11). Yet, the court recognized section 11 of the Violent Offender Against Youth Registration Act gives the State’s Attorney’s office in the county in which the offender was convicted the sole discretion to recommend the removal of a convicted…”
— 730 ILCS 154/11(a) — 2 cases
People v. Johnson, 870 N.E.2d 415 (Ill. 2007). “June 27, 2006 (adding 730 ILCS 154/11), citing 20 ILCS 4026/10 (West 2004).”
People v. Johnson (Ill. 2007). “June 27, 2006 (adding 730 ILCS 154/11), citing 20 1 Contrary to the State’s suggestion in its reply brief, section 86 of the Violent Offender Against Youth Registration Act provides no relief to the defendant.”
— 730 ILCS 154/11(a)(2) — 2 cases
People v. Johnson, 870 N.E.2d 415 (Ill. 2007). “June 27, 2006 (adding 730 ILCS 154/11), citing 20 ILCS 4026/10 (West 2004).”
People v. Johnson (Ill. 2007). “June 27, 2006 (adding 730 ILCS 154/11), citing 20 1 Contrary to the State’s suggestion in its reply brief, section 86 of the Violent Offender Against Youth Registration Act provides no relief to the defendant.”
— 730 ILCS 154/11(a)(3) — 2 cases
People v. Johnson, 870 N.E.2d 415 (Ill. 2007). “June 27, 2006 (adding 730 ILCS 154/11), citing 20 ILCS 4026/10 (West 2004).”
People v. Johnson (Ill. 2007). “June 27, 2006 (adding 730 ILCS 154/11), citing 20 1 Contrary to the State’s suggestion in its reply brief, section 86 of the Violent Offender Against Youth Registration Act provides no relief to the defendant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.