Illinois Compiled Statutes
735 ILCS 5/2-410 (2026)
Actions against joint debtors or partners
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(735 ILCS 5/2-410)
(from Ch. 110, par. 2-410)
Sec. 2-410.
Actions against joint debtors or partners.
All parties to a joint obligation, including a partnership
obligation, may be sued jointly, or separate actions may be brought
against one or more of them. A judgment against fewer than all the
parties to a joint or partnership obligation does not bar an action
against those not included in the judgment or not sued. Nothing herein
permits more than one satisfaction.
(Source: P.A. 82-280.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2021 · leading case: Hassebrock v. CEJA Corp., 2015 IL App (5th) 140037 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015).
Hassebrock v. CEJA Corp., 2015 IL App (5th) 140037 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “Referencing section 2-410 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2-410 (West 2012)), the plaintiff further asserts that the common-law rule should be deemed inapplicable, because Deep Rock and the defendant are jointly and severally liable on the venture agreement, and…”
Andrews v. Gonzalez, 2014 IL App (1st) 140342 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “(West 2012)) and sections 2-410 and 2-411 of the Code (735 ILCS 5/2-410, 2-411 (West 2012)) demonstrate that res judicata does not bar a judgment creditor of a partnership from enforcing an outstanding judgment against a partner who was named individually in the underlying…”
Andrews v. Gonzalez, 2014 IL App (1st) 140342 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “(West 2012)) and sections 2-410 and 2-411 of the Code (735 ILCS 5/2-410, 2-411 (West 2012)) demonstrate that 1-14-0342 res judicata does not bar a judgment creditor of a partnership from enforcing an outstanding judgment against a partner who was named individually in the…”
Hassebrock v. CEJA Corp., 2015 IL App (5th) 140037 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “Referencing section 2-410 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2-410 (West 2012)), the plaintiff further asserts that the common-law rule should be deemed inapplicable, because Deep Rock and the defendant are jointly and severally liable on the venture agreement, and…”
The Private Bank & Trust Co. v. EMS Investors, LLC, 2015 IL App (1st) 141689 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “”); 735 ILCS 5/2-410 (West 2012) (“All parties to a joint obligation, including a partnership obligation, may be sued jointly, or separate actions may be brought against one or more of them.”
The Private Bank & Trust Co. v. EMS Investors, LLC, 2015 IL App (1st) 141689 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “”); 735 ILCS 5/2-410 (West 2012) ("All parties to a joint obligation, including a partnership obligation, may be sued jointly, or separate actions may be brought -7- 1-14-1689 against one or more of them.”
Camp Street Crossing, LLC v. AD IN, Inc., 2021 IL App (3d) 200462-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “” 735 ILCS 5/2-410 (West 2020). “A judgment against fewer than all the parties to a joint *** obligation does not bar an action against those not included in the judgment or not sued.”
First Am. Bank v. Poplar Creek, LLC, 2020 IL App (1st) 192450 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “EMS Investors, LLC, 2015 IL App (1st) 141689, ¶ 18 ; see also 735 ILCS 5/2-410 (West 2018) (“All parties to a joint obligation *** may be sued jointly, or separate actions may be brought against one or more of them.”
The Private Bank & Trust Co. v. EMS Investors, LLC, 2015 IL App (1st) 141689 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “”); 735 ILCS 5/2-410 (West 2012) ("All parties to a joint obligation, including a partnership obligation, may be sued jointly, or separate actions may be brought -7- 1-14-1689 against one or more of them.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|