ILCS » Chapter 735 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

735 ILCS 5/2-604 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(735 ILCS 5/2-604) (from Ch. 110, par. 2-604)
    Sec. 2-604. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 93-387, eff. 7-25-03. Repealed by P.A. 101-403, eff. 1-1-20.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33 cases, 1993–2020 · leading case: Billy Joe Shaw v. Dow Brands, Inc., 994 F.2d 364 (7th Cir. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Billy Joe Shaw v. Dow Brands, Inc., 994 F.2d 364 (7th Cir. 1993). · cites it 2× “110, p 2-604, redesignated as of January 1, 1993 as 735 ILCS 5/2-604 ("Section 2-604")): 42 Every complaint and counterclaim shall contain specific prayers for the relief to which the pleader deems himself or herself entitled except that in actions for injury to the person, no…”
Back Doctors Ltd. v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins., 637 F.3d 827 (7th Cir. 2011). “735 ILCS 5/2-604 (“the [complaint’s] prayer for relief does not limit the relief obtainable”).”
Johnson v. Pushpin Holdings, LLC, 748 F.3d 769 (7th Cir. 2014). “Actually all we can find in Illinois statutory and case law are statements that a plaintiffs damages are not limited to the amount sought in the complaint, see 735 ILCS 5/2-604; In re Estate of Hoellen, 367 Ill.”
Am. Bankers Life Assurance Co. of Florida & Am. Bankers Ins. Co. of Florida v. Darrell J. Evans, 319 F.3d 907 (7th Cir. 2003). “Evans’s state-court complaint, in which he sought to represent a nationwide class of Lowe’s credit card holders, accused American of violating the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (“Consumer Fraud Act”) by charging credit insurance premiums to his…”
The Barbers, Hairstyling for Men & Women, Inc. v. Lela Bishop, 132 F.3d 1203 (7th Cir. 1998). “” Many states, of which Illinois is one, see 735 ILCS 5/2-604, follow the federal lead and permit parties to recover more than their pleadings seek.”
Midland Mgmt. Co. v. Am. Alt. Ins., 132 F. Supp. 3d 1014 (N.D. Ill. 2015). “735 ILCS 5/2-604 (2004); Oshana, 472 F.3d at 512 .”
Grimes v. Sage Telecom Commc'ns, LLC, 2018 IL App (1st) 171455 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “Even in the absence of forfeiture, we conclude that section 5-126 does not apply to a tender of relief to the named plaintiff in a class action suit.”
Charles v. Gore, 618 N.E.2d 554 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “” No money damages per se were identified or sought.”
In Re Haley D., 933 N.E.2d 421 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2× “" 735 ILCS 5/2-604 (West 2008). The content of the required notice, along with the acceptable methods of service, is included in Supreme Court Rule 105 (134 Ill.”
Gallo v. Homelite Consum. Prods., 371 F. Supp. 2d 943 (N.D. Ill. 2005). “In light of the fact that Illinois state court pleading rules disallow plaintiffs from specifying exact damages in personal injury actions, except to the minimum extent necessary to satisfy the jurisdictional requirements of the state courts, 735 ILCS 5/2-604; Campbell v. Bayou…”
Borcherding v. Anderson Remodeling Co., 624 N.E.2d 887 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “(735 ILCS 5/ 2-604 (West 1992); Kaput v. Hoey (1988), 124 Ill.”
Grimes v. Sage Telecom Commc'ns, LLC, 2018 IL App (1st) 171455 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “Section 2-604 of the Code (735 ILCS 5/2-604 (West 2016)) provides in pertinent part as follows: “Prayer for Relief.”
Show all 33 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.