Illinois Compiled Statutes
735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (2026)
Combined motions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(735 ILCS 5/2-619.1)
(from Ch. 110, par. 2-619.1)
Sec. 2-619.1.
Combined motions.
Motions with respect to
pleadings under Section 2-615, motions for involuntary dismissal
or other relief under Section 2-619, and motions for summary
judgment under Section 2-1005 may be filed together as a single
motion in any combination. A combined motion, however, shall be
in parts. Each part shall be limited to and shall specify that
it is made under one of Sections 2-615, 2-619, or 2-1005. Each
part shall also clearly show the points or grounds relied upon
under the Section upon which it is based.
(Source: P.A. 86-1156.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 878
cases (366 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: Nw. Illinois Area Agency on Aging v. Basta, 2022 IL App (2d) 210234 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022).
Nw. Illinois Area Agency on Aging v. Basta, 2022 IL App (2d) 210234 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (West 2020)), alleging that the matters complained of were untimely raised 2022 IL App (2d) 210234 or exempt from the Act’s rulemaking provisions (see 735 ILCS 5/2-615, 2-619(a)(5), (a)(9) (West 2020)).”
Reynolds v. Jimmy John's Enter., LLC, 2013 IL App (4th) 120139 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “1 of the Code (735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (West 2010)), asserting plaintiff commingled theories of direct and vicarious liability in his April 2011 complaint.”
Patrick Eng'g, Inc. v. The City of Naperville, 2012 IL 113148 (Ill. 2012). “See 735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (West 2010). The City argued that counts I and II should be dismissed under section 2-619 (735 ILCS 5/21-619 (West 2010)), and that count IV should be dismissed under section 2-615 (735 ILCS 5/2-615 (West 2010)).”
Gatreaux v. Dkw Enter., LLC, 958 N.E.2d 1088 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “1 of the Code (735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (West 2006)), contending that the action was moot since there was no actual case or controversy between the plaintiffs and the defendants as the individual plaintiffs were offered "full relief" by the defendants prior to obtaining a…”
CitiMortgage, Inc v. Parille, 2016 IL App (2d) 150286 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (West 2012)). The Parilles argued that counts I, IV, V, and VI should be dismissed under section 2-619 of the Code (735 ILCS 5/2-619 (West 2102)), based upon affirmative matters.”
Walworth Investments-LG, LLC v. Mu Sigma, Inc., 2022 IL 127177 (Ill. 2022). “1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (West 2018)), which allows a combined motion under sections 2-619 and 2-615 of the Code (id.”
Bianchi v. McQueen, 2016 IL App (2d) 150646 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “1 of the Code (735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (West 2014)). The motions relied on the same bases for dismissal.”
Illinois Road & Transp. Builders Ass'n v. Cnty. of Cook, 2022 IL 127126 (Ill. 2022). “1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (West 2018)), the circuit court dismissed the complaint, finding that plaintiffs lacked standing and that the complaint failed to state a violation of the Amendment.”
Hastings Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ultimate Backyard, 2012 IL App (1st) 101751 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “1 (735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (West 2010)), which states that motions with respect to pleadings under section 2-615 and motions for involuntary dismissal under section 2-619 may be filed together as a single motion in any combination.”
Thompson v. N.J., 2016 IL App (1st) 142918 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (West 2014)), arguing she did not assert a claim against plaintiff nor did she introduce her mental condition as required under the Act.”
Bjork v. O'Meara, 2013 IL 114044 (Ill. 2013). “1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (West 2008)) alleging defects under both section 2- 619(a)(5) and section 2-615 (735 ILCS 5/2-615, 2-619(a)(5) (West 2008)).”
Solaia Tech., LLC v. Specialty Publ'g Co., 852 N.E.2d 825 (Ill. 2006). “On February 20, 2003, the defendants filed a combined motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint (735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (West 2002)), arguing that these statements were not defamatory and that some of them were privileged.”
— 735 ILCS 5/2-619.1(a)(1) — 1 case
Chatman v. People, 2022 IL App (1st) 210925-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|