Illinois Compiled Statutes

740 ILCS 110/7 (2026)

Review of therapist or agency; use of recipient's record

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(740 ILCS 110/7) (from Ch. 91 1/2, par. 807)
    Sec. 7. Review of therapist or agency; use of recipient's record.
    (a) When a therapist or agency which provides services is being reviewed for purposes of licensure, statistical compilation, research, evaluation, or other similar purpose, a recipient's record may be used by the person conducting the review to the extent that this is necessary to accomplish the purpose of the review, provided that personally identifiable data is removed from the record before use. Personally identifiable data may be disclosed only in accordance with Section 5 of this Act. Licensure and the like may not be withheld or withdrawn for failure to disclose personally identifiable data if consent is not obtained.
    (b) When an agency which provides services is being reviewed for purposes of funding, accreditation, reimbursement or audit by a State or federal agency or accrediting body, a recipient's record may be used by the person conducting the review and personally identifiable information may be disclosed without consent, provided that the personally identifiable information is necessary to accomplish the purpose of the review.
    For the purpose of this subsection, an inspection investigation or site visit by the United States Department of Justice regarding compliance with a pending consent decree is considered an audit by a federal agency.
    (c) An independent team of experts under Brian's Law shall be entitled to inspect and copy the records of any recipient whose death is being examined by such a team pursuant to the mortality review process authorized by Brian's Law. Information disclosed under this subsection may not be redisclosed without the written consent of one of the persons identified in Section 4 of this Act.
(Source: P.A. 98-378, eff. 8-16-13.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2003–2006 · leading case: Doe v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 793 N.E.2d 119 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003).
Doe v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 793 N.E.2d 119 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). · cites it 3× “appeal, the Department argues that the court erred in finding that plaintiff had a right to nondisclosure of his mental health records because section 38 of the Medical Practice Act of 1987 (Medical Practice Act) (225 ILCS 60/38 (West 2000)) (section 38) and section 7(a) of the…”
Cordts v. Chicago Tribune Co., 860 N.E.2d 444 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “The Confidentiality Act’s specifically enumerated exceptions for where disclosures can be made without the mental health care recipient’s consent include, by way of example, disclosures for purposes of reviewing a therapist’s or agency’s licensure (740 ILCS 110/7(a) (West…”
Cordts v. Chicago Tribune Co. (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “The Confidentiality Act's specifically enumerated exceptions for where disclosures can be made without the mental health care recipient's consent include, by way of example, disclosures for purposes of reviewing a therapist's or agency's licensure (740 ILCS 110/7(a) (West…”
— 740 ILCS 110/7(a) — 3 cases
Doe v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 793 N.E.2d 119 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “appeal, the Department argues that the court erred in finding that plaintiff had a right to nondisclosure of his mental health records because section 38 of the Medical Practice Act of 1987 (Medical Practice Act) (225 ILCS 60/38 (West 2000)) (section 38) and section 7(a) of the…”
Cordts v. Chicago Tribune Co., 860 N.E.2d 444 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “The Confidentiality Act’s specifically enumerated exceptions for where disclosures can be made without the mental health care recipient’s consent include, by way of example, disclosures for purposes of reviewing a therapist’s or agency’s licensure (740 ILCS 110/7(a) (West…”
Cordts v. Chicago Tribune Co. (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “The Confidentiality Act's specifically enumerated exceptions for where disclosures can be made without the mental health care recipient's consent include, by way of example, disclosures for purposes of reviewing a therapist's or agency's licensure (740 ILCS 110/7(a) (West…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.