ILCS » Chapter 740 · Act 15
Illinois Compiled Statutes

740 ILCS 15/4 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(740 ILCS 15/4) (from Ch. 40, par. 1804)
    Sec. 4. (Repealed).
(Source: Laws 1947, p. 1181. Repealed by P.A. 99-90, eff. 1-1-16.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1994–2008 · leading case: Vann v. Vehrs, 633 N.E.2d 102 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vann v. Vehrs, 633 N.E.2d 102 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). · cites it 2× “The defendant also contended that the plaintiff did not comply with the Act’s requirement that within three months of the breach he notify her of his intent to file suit (740 ILCS 15/4 (West 1992)). The trial court denied the motion to dismiss, ruling that a replevin action for…”
Wildey v. Paulsen, 894 N.E.2d 862 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “See 740 ILCS 15/4 (West 1992). Wildey’s letter to Springs did not contain the required date.”
Schwalb v. Wood, 680 N.E.2d 773 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). · cites it 3× “The trial court found that Amy failed to comply with the notice requirements of section 4 of the Breach of Promise Act (Act) (740 ILCS 15/4 (West 1994)) because her notice failed to include the exact date on which the promise to marry was made.”
Wildey v. Paulsen (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “See 740 ILCS 15/4 (West 1992). Wildey’s letter to Springs did not contain the required date.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.