ILCS » Chapter 745 · Act 10
Illinois Compiled Statutes

745 ILCS 10/1-201 (2026)

Unless the context otherwise requires, words and terms used in this Act have the meanings ascribed to them in the following sections of this Part 2

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(745 ILCS 10/1-201) (from Ch. 85, par. 1-201)
    Sec. 1-201. Unless the context otherwise requires, words and terms used in this Act have the meanings ascribed to them in the following sections of this Part 2.
(Source: Laws 1965, p. 2983.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2023 · leading case: Carver v. Sheriff of La Salle Cnty..
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Carver v. Sheriff of La Salle Cnty. (Ill. 2003). “We begin our analysis with a review of article I of the Tort Immunity Act (745 ILCS 10/1-201 et seq. (West 2000)), which contains definitions of several words and terms used throughout the Act.”
Hudson v. City of Chicago (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “" 745 ILCS 10/1-201 (West 2004). Our supreme court has recently recounted that willful and wanton conduct "`"approaches the degree of moral blame attached to intentional harm, since the defendant deliberately inflicts a highly unreasonable risk of harm upon others in conscious…”
Hernandez v. City of Peoria, Illinois (C.D. Ill. 2023). “2007) (citing 745 ILCS 10/1-201). If a police officer shoots at a person contrary to his training or department rules and regulations, there is a reasonable inference that his actions were intentional or in utter indifference to or conscious disregard of the safety of others.”
Hudson v. City of Chicago (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “" 745 ILCS 10/1-201 (West 2004). Our supreme court has recently recounted that willful and wanton conduct " ' "approaches the degree of moral blame attached to intentional harm, since the defendant deliberately inflicts a highly unreasonable risk of harm upon others in conscious…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.