ILCS » Chapter 745 · Act 75
Illinois Compiled Statutes

745 ILCS 75/0.01 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(745 ILCS 75/0.01) (from Ch. 70, par. 200)
    Sec. 0.01. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Snow and Ice Removal Act.
(Source: P.A. 86-1324.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2024 · leading case: Murphy-Hylton v. Lieberman Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 2016 IL 120394 (Ill. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Murphy-Hylton v. Lieberman Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 2016 IL 120394 (Ill. 2017). · cites it 2× “OPINION ¶1 The question presented in this appeal involves the scope of the immunity provided under the Snow and Ice Removal Act (Act) (745 ILCS 75/0.01 et seq. (West 2010)). Plaintiff, Pamela Murphy-Hylton, slipped while walking on the sidewalk outside her condominium,…”
Murphy-Hylton v. Lieberman Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 2016 IL 120394 (Ill. 2016). “OPINION ¶1 The question presented in this appeal involves the scope of the immunity provided under the Snow and Ice Removal Act (Act) (745 ILCS 75/0.01 et seq. (West 2010)). Plaintiff, Pamela Murphy-Hylton, slipped while walking on the sidewalk outside her condominium,…”
Kasper v. McGill Mgmt. Inc., 2019 IL App (1st) 181204 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 2× “McGill also contended that it was protected under the Snow and Ice Removal Act (Act) (745 ILCS 75/0.01 et seq. (West 2012)) and that there was no evidence to suggest that the snow or ice on which plaintiff slipped was caused by any act by McGill or that the ice was created by…”
Kasper v. McGill Mgmt. Inc., 2019 IL App (1st) 181204 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 2× “McGill also contended that it was protected under the Snow and Ice Removal Act (Act) ( 745 ILCS 75/0.01 et seq. (West 2012)), and that there was no evidence to suggest that the snow or ice on which plaintiff slipped was caused by any act by McGill or that the ice was created by…”
Flight v. Am. Cmty. Mgmt., Inc., 384 Ill. App. 3d 540 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “On appeal, he contends the circuit court improperly based its ruling on the Snow and Ice Removal Act (Act) (745 ILCS 75/0.01 et seq. (West 2006)), which he claims is in derogation of the common law.”
Yu v. Kobayashi, 667 N.E.2d 106 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). “Defendants argued that the Snow and Ice Removal Act (Act) (745 ILCS 75/0.01 et seq. (West 1994)) barred recovery because plaintiffs alleged only that defendants were negligent and not that they engaged in any willful or wanton misconduct.”
Flight v. Am. Cmty. Mgmt., 893 N.E.2d 285 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “On appeal, he contends the circuit court improperly based its ruling on the Snow and Ice Removal Act (Act) (745 ILCS 75/0.01 et seq. (West 2006)), which he claims is in derogation of the common law.”
Reed v. Country Place Apts. Moweaqua I, L.P., 2016 IL App (5th) 150170 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “tion for summary judgment, contending that because the location of the apartment building was residential, and because the second amended complaint alleged, inter alia, injuries and damages resulting from negligent snow and ice 3 removal efforts by the defendants, the defendants…”
Murphy-Hylton v. Lieberman Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 2016 IL 120394 (Ill. 2016). “OPINION ¶1 The question presented in this appeal involves the scope of the immunity provided under the Snow and Ice Removal Act (Act) (745 ILCS 75/0.01 et seq. (West 2010)). Plaintiff, Pamela Murphy-Hylton, slipped while walking on the sidewalk outside her condominium,…”
Reed v. Country Place Apts. Moweaqua I, L.P., 2016 IL App (5th) 150170 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “tion for summary judgment, contending that because the location of the apartment building was residential, and because the second amended complaint alleged, inter alia, injuries and damages resulting from negligent snow and ice 3 removal efforts by the defendants, the defendants…”
Tudela v. Tron LLC, 2024 IL App (1st) 232438-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “When the defendants sought summary judgment, the circuit court sua sponte relied on the Snow and Ice Removal Act (745 ILCS 75/0.01 et seq. (West 2016)), and determined that, to avoid the statute, Tudela would need to plead willful and wanton conduct and that the defendants were…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.