ILCS » Chapter 750 · Act 22
Illinois Compiled Statutes

750 ILCS 22/606 (2026)

Procedure to contest validity or enforcement of registered support order

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(750 ILCS 22/606)
    Sec. 606. Procedure to contest validity or enforcement of registered support order.
    (a) A nonregistering party seeking to contest the validity or enforcement of a registered support order in this State shall request a hearing within the time required by Section 605. The nonregistering party may seek to vacate the registration, to assert any defense to an allegation of noncompliance with the registered order, or to contest the remedies being sought or the amount of any alleged arrearages pursuant to Section 607.
    (b) If the nonregistering party fails to contest the validity or enforcement of the registered support order in a timely manner, the order is confirmed by operation of law.
    (c) If a nonregistering party requests a hearing to contest the validity or enforcement of the registered support order, the registering tribunal shall schedule the matter for hearing and give notice to the parties of the date, time, and place of the hearing.
(Source: P.A. 99-119, eff. 1-1-16.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2002–2009 · leading case: In Re Marriage of Kohl, 778 N.E.2d 1169 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Marriage of Kohl, 778 N.E.2d 1169 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 3× “750 ILCS 22/606 (West 1998). She also argues that the record established that Menahem was personally served in the Israeli proceedings on December 23, 1981, and that he generally appeared four years later by sending a letter to the Netanyah, Israel, “Execution Bureau” objecting…”
Dep't of Healthcare & Fam. Servs. Ex Rel. Heard v. Heard, 916 N.E.2d 61 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “750 ILCS 22/606, 607 (West 2008). The party contesting the validity or enforcement of a registered order bears the burden of proving the asserted defense.”
In re Marriage of Kohl (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 3× “750 ILCS 22/606 (West 1998). She also argues that the record established that Menahem was personally served in the Israeli proceedings on December 23, 1981, and that he generally appeared four years later by sending a letter to the Netanyah, Israel, "Execution Bureau" objecting…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.