Illinois Compiled Statutes
750 ILCS 36/203 (2026)
Jurisdiction To Modify Determination
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(750 ILCS 36/203)
Sec. 203.
Jurisdiction To Modify Determination.
Except
as otherwise provided in Section 204, a court of this State may not modify a
child-custody
determination made by a court of another state unless a court of this
State
has jurisdiction to make an initial determination under Section 201(a)(1) or
(2) and:
(1) the court of the other state determines it no | longer has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction under Section 202 or that a court of this State would be a more convenient forum under Section 207; or |
(2) a court of this State or a court of the other | state determines that the child, the child's parents, and any person acting as a parent do not presently reside in the other state. |
(Source: P.A. 93-108, eff. 1-1-04.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2015–2023 · leading case: Gorup v. Brady, 2015 IL App (5th) 150078 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015).
Gorup v. Brady, 2015 IL App (5th) 150078 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “" 750 ILCS 36/203 (West 2014). Based on a plain reading of the statute, the UCCJEA requires a finding that the initial state has either ceded jurisdiction or that no party presently resides in that state (thus ending exclusive, continuing jurisdiction), and a finding that…”
Hernandez Camberos v. Palacios, 2021 IL App (2d) 210078 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “” 750 ILCS 36/203 (West 2018). ¶ 19 Here, for the first years of A.”
Gorup v. Brady, 2015 IL App (5th) 150078 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “” 750 ILCS 36/203 (West 2014). Based on a plain reading of the statute, the UCCJEA requires a finding that the initial state has either ceded jurisdiction or that no party presently resides in that state (thus ending exclusive, continuing jurisdiction), and a finding that…”
In re Est. of Mirabella S., 2018 IL App (3d) 180414 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “750 ILCS 36/203 (West 2016). Once a state makes an initial child custody determination, it retains exclusive continuing jurisdiction.”
In re Marriage of Soman, 2021 IL App (1st) 200513-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “Pamela’s motion asserted Andrew’s petitions were filed to forum shop and evade the Ohio courts and argued: (1) the Ohio court had exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to sections 203 and 206 of the UCCJEA (750 ILCS 36/203, 206 (West 2010)); (2) Andrew incorrectly relied on section…”
In re Marriage of Soman, 2023 IL App (1st) 220548-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “Pamela’s motion claimed that Andrew’s petitions were filed to forum- shop and evade the Ohio court and argued (1) that the Ohio court had exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to sections 203 and 206 of the Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) (750 ILCS…”
In re Marriage of Spirer, 2021 IL App (2d) 200560-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “750 ILCS 36/203 (West 2018) (Illinois court may not modify another state’s child-custody determination unless it has jurisdiction to make initial determination under section 201(a)(1) and (2) and Illinois court determines that the child and his or her parents do not presently…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|