Illinois Compiled Statutes

755 ILCS 5/5-3 (2026)

Power to ascertain and declare heirship - evidence

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(755 ILCS 5/5-3) (from Ch. 110 1/2, par. 5-3)
    Sec. 5-3. Power to ascertain and declare heirship - evidence.) (a) The court may ascertain and declare the heirship of any decedent to be entered of record in the court at any time during the administration of the estate without further notice or, if there is no grant of administration, upon such notice and in such manner as the court directs.
    (b) The ascertainment of heirship may be made from (1) an affidavit of any person stating the facts from which the heirship of the decedent can be ascertained, which affidavit shall be signed and sworn to or affirmed before any notary public or judge of any court of record in the United States or any of its possessions or territories and certified by the clerk thereof, or before any United States consul, vice-consul, consular agent, secretary of legation or commissioned officer in active service of the United States, within or without the United States, or (2) from evidence either in narrative form or by questions and answers which are reduced to writing and certified by the court declaring the heirship. The seal of office of any notary public, United States consul, vice-consul, consular agent or secretary of legation and the designation of the name, rank and branch of service of any commissioned officer in active service of the armed forces of the United States shall be sufficient evidence of his identity and official character. The affidavit or transcript of evidence shall be filed by the clerk of the court declaring the heirship and remain as a part of the files in the cause.
    (c) An order of the court declaring heirship is prima facie evidence of the heirship, but any other legal method of proving heirship may be resorted to by any party interested therein in any place or court where the question may arise.
    (d) For purposes of this section the court may presume, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, that the decedent and any person through whom heirship is traced was not the mother or father of any child born out of wedlock and, if the decedent or the person was a male, that no child born out of wedlock was filiated to or acknowledged or legitimated by the decedent or the person.
(Source: P.A. 81-598.)


 
    (755 ILCS 5/Art. VI heading)
ARTICLE VI
PROBATE OF WILLS AND ISSUANCE OF LETTERS OF OFFICE

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: In re Est. of McDonald, 2024 IL App (2d) 230195 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024).
In re Est. of McDonald, 2024 IL App (2d) 230195 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). · cites it 3× “Ellizzette argued that section 5-3 of the Probate Act (755 ILCS 5/5-3 (West 2022)) specifically authorizes the court to ascertain and declare heirship “at any time during the administration of the estate,” so the two-year limitation of section 18-12(b) cannot apply to changes in…”
Bangaly v. Baggiani, 2014 IL App (1st) 123760 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 2× “” 755 ILCS 5/5-3(c) (West 2010). Thus, the existence of an order of heirship establishes a presumption of heirship that affects the burden of producing evidence.”
Bangaly v. Baggiani, 2014 IL App (1st) 123760 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 2× “” 755 ILCS 5/5-3(c) (West 2010). Thus, the existence of an order of heirship establishes a presumption of heirship that affects the burden of producing evidence.”
In re Est. of Jagodowski, 2017 IL App (2d) 160723 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 4× “” 755 ILCS 5/5-3(a) (West 2016). -6- the estate.”
In re Est. of Jagodowski, 2017 IL App (2d) 160723 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 3× “” 755 ILCS 5/5-3(a) (West 2016). -9- 2017 IL App (2d) 160723 Probate Code.”
In Re Est. of Renchen, 939 N.E.2d 605 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “In coming to this conclusion, I reject Todd's reliance on section 3(c) of the Probate Act, which provides that the issue of heirship may be litigated "by any party interested therein in any place or court where the question may arise.”
In re Engle, 2026 IL App (3d) 250286-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2026). · cites it 2× “See 755 ILCS 5/5-3, 9-3 (West 2024). The former determines who will inherit from the intestate estate; the latter determines who will administer it.”
Bardhan v. Nw. Mem'l Hosp., 2026 IL App (1st) 240371-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2026). “¶ 92 Under the Probate Act, “[t]he ascertainment of heirship may be made from (1) an affidavit of any person stating the facts from which the heirship of the decedent can be ascertained *** or (2) from evidence either in narrative form or by questions and answers which are…”
In re Est. of Renchen (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “” 755 ILCS 5/5-3(c) (West 2006). An “interested person” includes “one who has *** a financial interest [] [or] property right *** which may be affected by the action ***, including[,] without limitation[,] an heir.”
In re Est. of Parisi (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “Moreover, the court evaluated all of this evidence in Carol's estate when it applied the Act and vacated the previous order of heirship. Thomas relies on the affidavits of heirship sworn to by Cherylee which state that Sam predeceased Carol and the orders of heirship entered…”
— 755 ILCS 5/5-3(a) — 3 cases
In re Est. of McDonald, 2024 IL App (2d) 230195 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “Ellizzette argued that section 5-3 of the Probate Act (755 ILCS 5/5-3 (West 2022)) specifically authorizes the court to ascertain and declare heirship “at any time during the administration of the estate,” so the two-year limitation of section 18-12(b) cannot apply to changes in…”
In re Est. of Jagodowski, 2017 IL App (2d) 160723 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 755 ILCS 5/5-3(a) (West 2016). -6- the estate.”
In re Est. of Jagodowski, 2017 IL App (2d) 160723 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 755 ILCS 5/5-3(a) (West 2016). -9- 2017 IL App (2d) 160723 Probate Code.”
— 755 ILCS 5/5-3(b) — 4 cases
In re Est. of Jagodowski, 2017 IL App (2d) 160723 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 755 ILCS 5/5-3(a) (West 2016). -9- 2017 IL App (2d) 160723 Probate Code.”
In re Est. of Jagodowski, 2017 IL App (2d) 160723 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 755 ILCS 5/5-3(a) (West 2016). -6- the estate.”
Bardhan v. Nw. Mem'l Hosp., 2026 IL App (1st) 240371-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2026). “¶ 92 Under the Probate Act, “[t]he ascertainment of heirship may be made from (1) an affidavit of any person stating the facts from which the heirship of the decedent can be ascertained *** or (2) from evidence either in narrative form or by questions and answers which are…”
In re Engle, 2026 IL App (3d) 250286-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2026). “See 755 ILCS 5/5-3, 9-3 (West 2024). The former determines who will inherit from the intestate estate; the latter determines who will administer it.”
— 755 ILCS 5/5-3(c) — 5 cases
Bangaly v. Baggiani, 2014 IL App (1st) 123760 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “” 755 ILCS 5/5-3(c) (West 2010). Thus, the existence of an order of heirship establishes a presumption of heirship that affects the burden of producing evidence.”
Bangaly v. Baggiani, 2014 IL App (1st) 123760 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “” 755 ILCS 5/5-3(c) (West 2010). Thus, the existence of an order of heirship establishes a presumption of heirship that affects the burden of producing evidence.”
In Re Est. of Renchen, 939 N.E.2d 605 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “In coming to this conclusion, I reject Todd's reliance on section 3(c) of the Probate Act, which provides that the issue of heirship may be litigated "by any party interested therein in any place or court where the question may arise.”
In re Est. of Renchen (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “” 755 ILCS 5/5-3(c) (West 2006). An “interested person” includes “one who has *** a financial interest [] [or] property right *** which may be affected by the action ***, including[,] without limitation[,] an heir.”
In re Est. of Parisi (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “Moreover, the court evaluated all of this evidence in Carol's estate when it applied the Act and vacated the previous order of heirship. Thomas relies on the affidavits of heirship sworn to by Cherylee which state that Sam predeceased Carol and the orders of heirship entered…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.