Illinois Compiled Statutes

760 ILCS 20/3 (2026)

Scope and Jurisdiction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(760 ILCS 20/3) (from Ch. 110 1/2, par. 253)
    Sec. 3. Scope and Jurisdiction. (a) This Act applies to a transfer that refers to this Act in the designation under Section 10(a) by which the transfer is made if at the time of the transfer, the transferor, the minor, or the custodian is a resident of this State or the custodial property is located in this State. The custodianship so created remains subject to this Act despite a subsequent change in residence of a transferor, the minor, or the custodian, or the removal of custodial property from this State.
    (b) A person designated as custodian under this Act is subject to personal jurisdiction in this State with respect to any matter relating to the custodianship.
    (c) A transfer that purports to be made and which is valid under the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act, or a substantially similar act, of another state is governed by the law of the designated state and may be executed and is enforceable in this State if at the time of the transfer, the transferor, the minor, or the custodian is a resident of the designated state or the custodial property is located in the designated state.
(Source: P.A. 84-915.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: Anderson v. Anderson, 2021 IL App (3d) 200497-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021).
Anderson v. Anderson, 2021 IL App (3d) 200497-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). · cites it 2× “As to the court’s personal jurisdiction over Caroline, she argued that the Illinois Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (IUTMA) provided personal jurisdiction over Caroline (citing 760 ILCS 20/3 (West 2016)) and that the Illinois long-arm statute applied (735 ILCS 5/2-209 (West…”
— 760 ILCS 20/3(b) — 1 case
Anderson v. Anderson, 2021 IL App (3d) 200497-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “As to the court’s personal jurisdiction over Caroline, she argued that the Illinois Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (IUTMA) provided personal jurisdiction over Caroline (citing 760 ILCS 20/3 (West 2016)) and that the Illinois long-arm statute applied (735 ILCS 5/2-209 (West…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.