765 ILCS 77/1

Short title

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(765 ILCS 77/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Residential Real Property Disclosure Act.
(Source: P.A. 88-111.)


 
    (765 ILCS 77/Art. 2 heading)
ARTICLE 2
DISCLOSURES
(Source: P.A. 94-280, eff. 1-1-06.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 68 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: The Henderson Square Condominium Association v. Lab Townhouses
The Henderson Square Condominium Association v. Lab Townhouses (2014) illappct · cites it 3× “" ¶ 113 Plaintiffs ask that we compare section 13-72-030 to the Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (the Disclosure Act) (765 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 2010)). Plaintiffs argue that the Disclosure Act serves a similar role as section 13-72-030 of the Chicago Municipal Code,…”
Hawkins v. Voss (2015) illappct · cites it 3× “¶2 Plaintiff brought suit against defendants, Wayne Voss, Mark Voss, and Tim Voss, alleging breach of contract, negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty for defendants' failure to provide plaintiff a disclosure form to give to the buyers of plaintiff's home as required by the…”
TERRACES OF SUNSET PARK, LLC v. Chamberlin (2010) illappct · cites it 3× “” Alternatively, assuming that a valid contract existed, The Terraces declared the contract terminated because Chamberlin and Dorigan failed to furnish an “Illinois Residential Real Property Disclosure Report” as required by the Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (Act)…”
Provenzale v. Forister (2001) illappct “Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in dismissing their claims for (1) violation of the Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (Disclosure Act) (765 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 1996)); (2) violation of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Consumer…”
Curtis Investment Firm, Ltd. Partnership v. Schuch (2001) illappct · cites it 2× “On appeal, the Schuches claim that Curtis Investment waived any right to recovery under the Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (Act) (765 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 1998)) by failing to demand a disclosure report prior to closing.”
Erlenbush v. Largent (2004) illappct “Count III alleged a violation of the Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (Disclosure Act) (765 ILCS 77/1 through 99 (West 1998)). Count IV sought a rescission of the contract.”
Coughlin v. Gustafson (2002) illappct · cites it 2× “JUSTICE BUCKLEY delivered the opinion of the court: This appeal arises from summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Nuala Gustafson and against plaintiffs William Coughlin and Pamela Coughlin on plaintiffs’ four-count complaint which alleged breach of a real estate sales…”
Penn v. Gerig (2002) illappct “Count III of plaintiffs’ complaint alleged noncompliance with the Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (Act) (765 ILCS 77/1 through 99 (West 1996)) and count X alleged common-law fraud.”
Allstate Insurance v. Lane (2003) illappct “The Sterns filed their amended complaint, seeking rescission of the sales contract or restitution under the theories of fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, violation of the Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (765 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 1998)) and…”
Rolando v. Pence (2002) illappct “Following plaintiffs’ case in chief, defendants moved for a directed finding, arguing that representations made pursuant to the Illinois Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (the Act) (765 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 1998)) cannot form the basis for a fraudulent…”
Kroot v. Chan (2017) illappct “67 "plus costs and fees" on the plaintiffs' claims for a violation of the Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (Act) ( 765 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 2012)) and common law fraud; (3) entering judgment against them and in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $28,130.”
Hirsch v. Feuer (1998) illappct “JUSTICE GREIMAN delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiffs Martin and Noreen Hirsch brought suit against defendants Stuart and Helen Feuer alleging claims for breach of contract, violation of the Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (765 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 1994))…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.