ILCS » Chapter 775 · Act 60
Illinois Compiled Statutes

775 ILCS 60/15 (2026)

Violation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(775 ILCS 60/15)
    Sec. 15. Violation. A violation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), Section 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18116), Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12132 et seq.), the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.), Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), or the provisions of any other federal statute prohibiting discrimination under a program or activity receiving federal financial assistance shall constitute a violation of this Act.
(Source: P.A. 103-150, eff. 1-1-24.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2024–2025 · leading case: Pogorzelska v. VanderCook Coll. of Music (N.D. Ill. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pogorzelska v. VanderCook Coll. of Music (N.D. Ill. 2024). · cites it 2× “775 ILCS 60/15, 20. On January 29, 2024, Plaintiff filed the instant motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) for leave to amend her complaint solely to add a claim under the CRRRA.”
Pogorzelska v. VanderCook Coll. of Music (N.D. Ill. 2024). “775 ILCS 60/15, 20. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion in limine 1 is granted as to punitive damages but denied as to emotional-distress damages.”
B. v. Bd. of Educ. Hinsdale Twp., Hinsdale High Sch. Dist. 86 (N.D. Ill. 2025). “See 775 ILCS 60/15 (A violation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act or Title Il of the ADA “shall constitute a violation of this Act.”
Strzykalski v. Bd. of Educ. of Summit Hill Sch. Dist. 161 (N.D. Ill. 2025). “See 775 ILCS 60/15, 20. Sufficient Connection Defendants argue that Strzykalski is bringing a third-party retaliation claim and must show that she had a sufficient connection to Student A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.