ILCS » Chapter 810 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

810 ILCS 5/2-208 (2026)

(Blank)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(810 ILCS 5/2-208) (from Ch. 26, par. 2-208)
    Sec. 2-208. (Blank).
(Source: P.A. 95-895, eff. 1-1-09.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1993–2007 · leading case: Scott v. Assurance Co. of Am., 625 N.E.2d 439 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Scott v. Assurance Co. of Am., 625 N.E.2d 439 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). · cites it 5× “) (810 ILCS 5/2-208, Uniform Commercial Code Comment, at 124 (Smith-Hurd 1993).”
In Re Marriage of Wassom, 815 N.E.2d 1251 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “See also 810 ILCS 5/2-208 (West 2002) (course of performance or practical construction in commercial cases).”
R.T. Hepworth Co. v. Dependable Ins. Co., Inc., Third-Party v. Aegon Usa, Inc., Third-Party, 997 F.2d 315 (3rd Cir. 1993). “, 810 ILCS 5/2-208(2) (under the Uniform Commercial Code, express terms and course of performance and usage of trade should be harmonized, but where such construction is unreasonable, express terms control).”
Ginocchio v. Am. Bankers Life Assurance Co., 889 F. Supp. 1078 (N.D. Ill. 1995). “The parties agree that the Statement plaintiffs signed indicates that the “term” of Peter’s credit disability insurance is 36 months. Plaintiffs assert, however, that the Policy is ambiguous because it fails to explain: (1) defendant’s liability under the Policy for plaintiffs’…”
Midwest Builders v. Lord & Essex (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 3× “Section 2-208(1) of the UCC provides: “Where the contract for sale involves repeated occasions for performance by either party with knowledge of the nature of the performance and opportunity for objection to it by the other, any course of performance accepted or acquiesced in…”
In re Marriage of Wassom (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “See also 810 ILCS 5/2-208 (West 2002) (course of performance or practical construction in commercial cases).”
— 810 ILCS 5/2-208(1) — 2 cases
Scott v. Assurance Co. of Am., 625 N.E.2d 439 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “) (810 ILCS 5/2-208, Uniform Commercial Code Comment, at 124 (Smith-Hurd 1993).”
Midwest Builders v. Lord & Essex (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “Section 2-208(1) of the UCC provides: “Where the contract for sale involves repeated occasions for performance by either party with knowledge of the nature of the performance and opportunity for objection to it by the other, any course of performance accepted or acquiesced in…”
— 810 ILCS 5/2-208(2) — 4 cases
Scott v. Assurance Co. of Am., 625 N.E.2d 439 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “) (810 ILCS 5/2-208, Uniform Commercial Code Comment, at 124 (Smith-Hurd 1993).”
R.T. Hepworth Co. v. Dependable Ins. Co., Inc., Third-Party v. Aegon Usa, Inc., Third-Party, 997 F.2d 315 (3rd Cir. 1993). “, 810 ILCS 5/2-208(2) (under the Uniform Commercial Code, express terms and course of performance and usage of trade should be harmonized, but where such construction is unreasonable, express terms control).”
Ginocchio v. Am. Bankers Life Assurance Co., 889 F. Supp. 1078 (N.D. Ill. 1995). “The parties agree that the Statement plaintiffs signed indicates that the “term” of Peter’s credit disability insurance is 36 months. Plaintiffs assert, however, that the Policy is ambiguous because it fails to explain: (1) defendant’s liability under the Policy for plaintiffs’…”
Midwest Builders v. Lord & Essex (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “Section 2-208(1) of the UCC provides: “Where the contract for sale involves repeated occasions for performance by either party with knowledge of the nature of the performance and opportunity for objection to it by the other, any course of performance accepted or acquiesced in…”
— 810 ILCS 5/2-208(3) — 1 case
Midwest Builders v. Lord & Essex (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “Section 2-208(1) of the UCC provides: “Where the contract for sale involves repeated occasions for performance by either party with knowledge of the nature of the performance and opportunity for objection to it by the other, any course of performance accepted or acquiesced in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.