Illinois Compiled Statutes
815 ILCS 306/85 (2026)
Violations
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(815 ILCS 306/85)
Sec. 85.
Violations.
Whenever an automotive repair facility is
knowingly engaged in or has knowingly engaged in a persistent practice or
pattern of conduct at a single location that violates this Act, that knowing,
persistent practice or pattern of conduct shall be deemed an unlawful act or
practice under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act.
In the case of such a knowing, persistent practice or pattern of conduct, all
remedies, penalties, and authority available to the Attorney General and the
several State's Attorneys under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business
Practices Act for the enforcement of that Act shall be available for the
enforcement of this Act.
(Source: P.A. 90-426, eff. 1-1-98.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2008–2026 · leading case: Jandeska v. Prairie Int'l Trucks, Inc., 893 N.E.2d 673 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
Jandeska v. Prairie Int'l Trucks, Inc., 893 N.E.2d 673 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “See 815 ILCS 306/85 (West 2004). For the reasons stated, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.”
Nicholas v. Amazon.Com Inc (W.D. Wash. 2025). “815 ILCS 306/85 and 505 7/(a). “Because these remedies are more than adequate to 14 accomplish the statute’s regulatory objectives,” the court held that the Automotive Repair Act 15 does not contain an express or implied private right of action.”
Turner v. GAC Star Quality, Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2023). “815 ILCS 306/85; 815 ILCS 505/2Z. Under the ICFA, the state attorney general may subject Repair Act violators to injunctive relief, revocation of their business license, and civil penalties not to exceed $50,000 (a nontrivial amount for many auto repair businesses).”
Hart v. MD Racing, Inc., 2026 IL App (4th) 250478-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2026). “815 ILCS 306/85 (West 2022). We also note that section 75 of the Automotive Repair Act provides that repair facilities that fail to comply with the Act are “barred from asserting a possessory or chattel lien for the amount of the unauthorized parts or labor upon the motor…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|