815 ILCS 603/1

Short title

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(815 ILCS 603/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Contractor Prompt Payment Act.
(Source: P.A. 95-567, eff. 8-31-07.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2021 · leading case: GX Chicago, LLC v. Galaxy Environmental, Inc.
GX Chicago, LLC v. Galaxy Environmental, Inc. (2015) illappct · cites it 2× “See 815 ILCS 603/1 et seq. (West 2012). Second, the Galaxy subcontractors asserted an “unclean hands” defense, claiming that certain change orders relied upon by Ledcor and Galaxy to support their position that only $126,178.”
BX Chicago, LLC v. Galaxy Environmental, Inc. (2015) illappct “That affirmative defense pleaded that Galaxy submitted various payment applications to Ledcor which reflected work by the Galaxy subcontractors and that "[p]ursuant to the Contractor Prompt Payment Act, 815 ILCS 603/1 et seq., particularly [section] 10, the payment applications…”
Omega Demolition Corporation v. Judlau Contracting, Inc (2020) illappct “(West 2018)) or $156,768, based on the Contractor Prompt Payment Act (815 ILCS 603/1 et seq. (West 2018)). Plaintiff contended that it had proved all four counts of its amended complaint.”
H.B.D. Construction, Inc. v. Eco Jazz, Inc. (2021) illappct “The Trial Court Proceedings ¶ 11 On July 10, 2014, HBD filed a four-count complaint against, inter alia, Eco and the ESLHA, bringing the following causes of action: breach of contract, quantum meruit, enforcement of a mechanic’s lien, and violation of the Contractor Prompt…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.