Illinois Compiled Statutes

820 ILCS 105/14 (2026)

Nothing in this Act is deemed to interfere with, impede, or in any way diminish the right of employees to bargain collectively with their employers through representatives of their own choosing in order to establish wages or other conditions of work in excess of the applicable minimum standards of the provisions of this Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(820 ILCS 105/14) (from Ch. 48, par. 1014)
    Sec. 14. Nothing in this Act is deemed to interfere with, impede, or in any way diminish the right of employees to bargain collectively with their employers through representatives of their own choosing in order to establish wages or other conditions of work in excess of the applicable minimum standards of the provisions of this Act.
(Source: P.A. 77-1451.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2005–2013 · leading case: Gelb v. Air Con Refrigeration & Heating, Inc., 826 N.E.2d 391 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005).
Gelb v. Air Con Refrigeration & Heating, Inc., 826 N.E.2d 391 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). “” 820 ILCS 105/14 (West 2000). Defendants responded that they complied with the terms of the collective bargaining agreement between them and plaintiffs’ union in calculating and paying overtime wages.”
Mitchell v. JCG Indus., 929 F. Supp. 2d 827 (N.D. Ill. 2013). “" 820 ILCS 105/14 (emphasis added). The federal counterpart to the IMWL is the FLSA.”
Mitchell v. Jcg Indus., 792 F. Supp. 2d 1005 (N.D. Ill. 2011). “” 820 ILCS 105/14 (emphasis added). The federal counterpart to the IMWL is FLSA section 203(o), which allows parties to a CBA to specifically exclude donning and doffing from the amount of hours worked for the purpose of calculating the minimum wage and maximum workweek.”
Mitchell v. JCG Indus., 842 F. Supp. 2d 1080 (N.D. Ill. 2012). “” 820 ILCS 105/14 (emphasis added). The federal counterpart to the IMWL is the FLSA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.