ILCS » Chapter 820 · Act 405
Illinois Compiled Statutes

820 ILCS 405/804 (2026)

Conduct of hearings-Service of notice

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(820 ILCS 405/804) (from Ch. 48, par. 474)
    Sec. 804. Conduct of hearings-Service of notice.    The manner in which disputed claims for benefits shall be presented and the conduct of hearings and appeals shall be in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Director for determining the rights of the parties. A full and complete record shall be kept of all proceedings in connection with a disputed claim. All testimony at any hearing upon a disputed claim shall be recorded but need not be transcribed unless the disputed claim is further appealed.
    Whenever the giving of notice is required by Sections 701, 702, 703, 801, 803, 805, and 900, it may be given and be completed by mailing the same to the last known address of the person entitled thereto. If agreed to by the person or entity entitled to notice, notice may be given and completed electronically, in the manner prescribed by rule, by posting the notice on a secure web site accessible to the person or entity and sending notice of the posting to the last known e-mail address of the person or entity.
(Source: P.A. 97-621, eff. 11-18-11.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2003–2023 · leading case: Burns v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 795 N.E.2d 972 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Burns v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 795 N.E.2d 972 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). · cites it 2× “PRN relies upon section 804 of the Unemployment Insurance Act (820 ILCS 405/804 (West 2000)), which authorizes notice to a party’s last known address in proceedings before the Department (820 ILCS 405/804 (West 2000)), and claims that the legislature’s use of “last known…”
Thompson v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 928 N.E.2d 528 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “820 ILCS 405/804 (West 2008); Esmail v. Department of Revenue, 371 Ill.”
520 South Michigan Avenue Assocs. v. Deptartment of Emp. Sec., 935 N.E.2d 612 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “820 ILCS 405/804 (West 2008) (“the conduct of hearings and appeals shall be in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Director for determining the rights of the parties”); 56 Ill.”
Burns v. Dep't of Emp. Sec. (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). · cites it 2× “PRN relies upon section 804 of the Unemployment Insurance Act (820 ILCS 405/804 (West 2000)), which authorizes notice to a party's last known address in proceedings before the Department (820 ILCS 405/804 (West 2000)), and claims that the legislature's use of "last known…”
Cassandra Washington v. Chicago Bd. of Educ. (7th Cir. 2019). “Washington cites no authority requiring the Board to remove the Corrective Action Plan from her file except her opinion that it was not “based on facts.” And despite her view that the Board would have no basis to challenge an unemployment claim, it was free to do so.”
Cassandra Washington v. Chicago Bd. of Educ. (7th Cir. 2019). “Washington cites no authority requiring the Board to remove the Corrective Action Plan from her file except her opinion that it was not “based on facts.” And despite her view that the Board would have no basis to challenge an unemployment claim, it was free to do so.”
Edmon v. The Dep't of Emp. Sec., 2022 IL App (1st) 210178-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “3d at 395 ; see also 820 ILCS 405/804 (West 2020). The time for filing an appeal is “strictly jurisdictional” (Automated Professional Tax Services, Inc.”
King v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 2022 IL App (1st) 210215-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “820 ILCS 405/804 (West 2020); 56 Ill. Admin.”
Harris v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 2023 IL App (1st) 220405-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “(citing 820 ILCS 405/804 (West 2008)). Where a plaintiff files an appeal to the Board more than 30 days after the referee’s decision was mailed to the plaintiff, the Board correctly concludes that it lacks authority to review the untimely appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.