Iowa Code » Chapter 1 — SOVEREIGNTY AND JURISDICTION OF THE STATE
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 1.5 (2026)

Federal wildlife and fish refuge

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The state of Iowa hereby consents that the government of the United States may in any manner acquire in this state such areas of land or water or of land and water as said government may deem necessary for the establishment of the “Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge” in accordance with the Act of Congress, approved June 7, 1924, [16 U.S.C. ch 8] provided the states of Illinois, Wisconsin, and Minnesota grant a like consent. [C27, 31, 35, §4-a1; C39, §4.1; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §1.5] 2017 Acts, ch 54, §1 Referred to in §1.6, 1.8

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1969–2020 · leading case: State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel Ramirez, 895 N.W.2d 884 (Iowa 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel Ramirez, 895 N.W.2d 884 (Iowa 2017). · cites it 2× “See 1 LaFave § 1.5(c), at 239 (stating that the approach in Mollica “makes good sense”).”
State, Dep't of Human Servs. Ex Rel. Palmer v. Unisys Corp., 637 N.W.2d 142 (Iowa 2001). · cites it 2× “Palmer, The Law of Restitution § 1.5(d), at 29 (1978) [hereinafter Palmer].”
State v. Sisco, 169 N.W.2d 542 (Iowa 1969). · cites it 4× “4), (ii) the inquiry into the voluntariness of the plea (as required in section 1.5), and (iii) the inquiry into the accuracy of the plea (as required in section 1.”
Sunset Mobile Home Park v. Parsons, 324 N.W.2d 452 (Iowa 1982). · cites it 2× “2d Landlord and Tenant §§ 70-73 (1970); Restatement (Second) Property § 1.5 (1977); see also Iowa Code § 562.6 (farm tenancies continue for the following year upon the same terms unless written notice is timely given).”
State v. Runge, 228 N.W.2d 35 (Iowa 1975). · cites it 2× “Section 1.5, ABA Standards Relating to Pleas of Guilty (Approved Draft), states: “The court should not accept a plea of guilty or nolo contendere without first determining that the plea is voluntary.”
State v. Fisher, 223 N.W.2d 243 (Iowa 1974). “By inquiry of the prosecuting attorney and defense counsel, the court should determine whether the tendered plea is the result of prior plea discussions and a plea agreement, and, if it is, what agreement has been reached.”
State v. Maxwell, 222 N.W.2d 432 (Iowa 1974). “Evidence is not inadmissible simply because it is cumulative, and the admission of such evidence rests largely in the discretion of the trial court.”
Phillips v. Iowa, 185 F. Supp. 2d 992 (N.D. Iowa 2002). · cites it 2× “, Substantive Ceiminal Law § 1.5, at 30 (1986). Both specific and general deterrence is, therefore, a primary focus of criminal punishment.”
Foster v. Schwickerath, 780 N.W.2d 746 (Iowa Ct. App. 2009). “Restatement (Second) of Property § 1.5, at 36 (1977). The Restatement provides the proper rule to be followed: “In the absence of controlling provisions in the lease .”
VeroBlue Farms USA, Inc. v. Jackson Walker LLP (Bankr. D. Iowa 2020). · cites it 5× “at § 1.5(b). The Agreement further defines “Person” as “any individual, corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability company, association or other entity.”
Ceaser v. Ault, 169 F. Supp. 2d 981 (N.D. Iowa 2001). · cites it 2× “Scott, Jr, Substantive Criminal Law § 1.5, at 30 (1986). Both specific and general deterrence is, therefore, a primary focus of criminal punishment.”
Amended August 1, 2017 State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel Ramirez (Iowa 2017). “See 1 LaFave § 1.5(c), at 239 (stating that the approach in Mollica “makes good sense”).”
— Iowa Code § 1.5(b) — 1 case
VeroBlue Farms USA, Inc. v. Jackson Walker LLP (Bankr. D. Iowa 2020). “at § 1.5(b). The Agreement further defines “Person” as “any individual, corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability company, association or other entity.”
— Iowa Code § 1.5(c) — 2 cases
State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel Ramirez, 895 N.W.2d 884 (Iowa 2017). “See 1 LaFave § 1.5(c), at 239 (stating that the approach in Mollica “makes good sense”).”
Amended August 1, 2017 State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel Ramirez (Iowa 2017). “See 1 LaFave § 1.5(c), at 239 (stating that the approach in Mollica “makes good sense”).”
— Iowa Code § 1.5(d) — 1 case
State, Dep't of Human Servs. Ex Rel. Palmer v. Unisys Corp., 637 N.W.2d 142 (Iowa 2001). “Palmer, The Law of Restitution § 1.5(d), at 29 (1978) [hereinafter Palmer].”
— Iowa Code § 1.5(jj) — 1 case
VeroBlue Farms USA, Inc. v. Jackson Walker LLP (Bankr. D. Iowa 2020). “at § 1.5(b). The Agreement further defines “Person” as “any individual, corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability company, association or other entity.”
— Iowa Code § 1.5(v) — 1 case
VeroBlue Farms USA, Inc. v. Jackson Walker LLP (Bankr. D. Iowa 2020). “at § 1.5(b). The Agreement further defines “Person” as “any individual, corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability company, association or other entity.”
— Iowa Code § 1.5(vv) — 1 case
VeroBlue Farms USA, Inc. v. Jackson Walker LLP (Bankr. D. Iowa 2020). “at § 1.5(b). The Agreement further defines “Person” as “any individual, corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability company, association or other entity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.