Iowa Code » Chapter 17A — IOWA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 17A.20 (2026)

Appeals

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An aggrieved or adversely affected party to the judicial review proceeding may obtain a review of any final judgment of the district court under this chapter by appeal. The appeal shall be taken as in other civil cases, although the appeal may be taken regardless of the amount involved. [C75, 77, 79, 81, §17A.20] 83 Acts, ch 186, §10007, 10201 Referred to in §207.15, 231.78, 252.27, 321.52

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 143 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1976–2022 · leading case: Jackson Cnty. Pub. Hosp. v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 280 N.W.2d 426 (Iowa 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jackson Cnty. Pub. Hosp. v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 280 N.W.2d 426 (Iowa 1979). · cites it 12× “11(5), would have been filed sixteen days late. C. Finally, the parties have raised a question regarding the scope of this court's review of a district court's decision on judicial review of agency action.”
Loras Coll. v. Iowa Civil Rights Comm'n, 285 N.W.2d 143 (Iowa 1979). · cites it 12× “The Commission appealed under section 17A.20, The Code 1977. Because we find section 601A.”
Cont'l Tel. Co. v. Colton, 348 N.W.2d 623 (Iowa 1984). · cites it 8× “" Section 17A.20 provides: An aggrieved or adversely affected party to the judicial review proceeding may obtain a review of any final judgment of the district court under this chapter by appeal to the supreme court.”
Sommers v. Iowa Civil Rights Comm'n, 337 N.W.2d 470 (Iowa 1983). · cites it 4× “Iowa Code § 17A.20 (1981). Section 17A.20 provides: An aggrieved or adversely affected party to the judicial review proceeding may obtain a review of any final judgment of the district court under this chapter by appeal to the supreme court.”
Hoffman v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 257 N.W.2d 22 (Iowa 1977). · cites it 4× “An appeal from the determination of the district court is allowed under § 17A.20. Our review in a contested case under § 17A.”
Budding v. Iowa Dep't of Job Serv., 337 N.W.2d 219 (Iowa Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 4× “Scope of Review Our scope of review in cases arising out of the Iowa Administrative Procedure Act is limited under Iowa Code § 17A.20 to the correction of errors in law.”
Bishop v. Iowa State Bd. of Pub. Instruction, 395 N.W.2d 888 (Iowa 1986). · cites it 8× “Iowa Code § 17A.20; Iowa R.App.P. 1(a). In Continental Telephone Co.”
Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc. v. Iowa Civil Rights Comm'n, 453 N.W.2d 512 (Iowa 1990). · cites it 3× “See Iowa Code § 17A.20. We first consider the issues raised in Hy-Vee’s appeal and then the issues raised in the commission’s cross-appeal.”
Hawk v. Jim Hawk Chevrolet-Buick, Inc., 282 N.W.2d 84 (Iowa 1979). · cites it 4× “Appeal to us by the employer and insurance carrier is under section 17A.20, The Code 1977. The following issues are presented for our review: (1) Whether the commissioner's findings and holdings that the death of Hawk did not arise out of and in the course of his employment are…”
Charles City Educ. Ass'n v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 291 N.W.2d 663 (Iowa 1980). · cites it 4× “Both PERB and the District appealed to us under section 17A.20. The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the Association's proposal regarding the nature of graduate credit hours necessary for advancement along the salary schedule is a mandatory subject of bargaining…”
Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Civil Rights Comm'n, 318 N.W.2d 162 (Iowa 1982). · cites it 2× “See also § 601A.17(1), The Code (“Judicial review of the actions of the commission may be sought in accordance with the terms of the Iowa administrative procedure Act.”
Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers, Local Union No. 238 v. Iowa Civil Rights Comm'n, 394 N.W.2d 375 (Iowa 1986). · cites it 2× “The Union has appealed the district court’s ruling, Iowa Code section 17A.20, mainly contending: (1) the district court erred in concluding the Commission’s decision was supported by substantial evidence; (2) the Commission did not have the authority to award damages for…”
Show all 143 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.