Iowa Code
Iowa Code § 232.115 (2026)
Reporter required
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Stenographic notes or electronic or mechanical recordings shall be taken of all court hearings held pursuant to this subchapter unless waived by the parties. The child shall not be competent to waive the reporting requirement, but waiver may be made for the child by the child’s counsel or guardian ad litem. Matters which must be reported under the provisions of this section shall be reported in the same manner as required in section 624.9. [C81, §232.115] 2020 Acts, ch 1062, §94
\nNotes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: In the Interest of T.S. & K.G., Minor Child., L.G., Mother, K.G., Father of K.G., 868 N.W.2d 425 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015).
In the Interest of T.S. & K.G., Minor Child., L.G., Mother, K.G., Father of K.G., 868 N.W.2d 425 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015). “” Iowa Code § 232.115 (1)(e)(3). “‘[S]ignificant and meaningful contact’ includes but is not limited to the affirmative assumption by the parents of the duties encompassed by the role of being a parent.”
In the Interest of Adkins, 298 N.W.2d 273 (Iowa 1980). “§ 232.115(4), The Code. These related statutes reveal a legislative scheme to provide for termination in the same court in which the CHINA adjudication has taken place, as a logical resolution of a child’s “limbo” CHINA status where clear and convincing evidence discloses the…”
In the Interest of C.R., Minor Child (Iowa Ct. App. 2026). “The juvenile court terminated the mother’s rights under Iowa Code section 232.116(1)(f ).”
— Iowa Code § 232.115(1) — 1 case
In the Interest of C.R., Minor Child (Iowa Ct. App. 2026). “The juvenile court terminated the mother’s rights under Iowa Code section 232.116(1)(f ).”
— Iowa Code § 232.115(4) — 1 case
In the Interest of Adkins, 298 N.W.2d 273 (Iowa 1980). “§ 232.115(4), The Code. These related statutes reveal a legislative scheme to provide for termination in the same court in which the CHINA adjudication has taken place, as a logical resolution of a child’s “limbo” CHINA status where clear and convincing evidence discloses the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.