1. a. In developing studies and surveys, the area education agency board shall consult with the officials of school districts in the area and other citizens, shall from time to time hold public hearings, and may employ such research and other assistance as it may determine reasonably necessary in order to properly carry on its survey and prepare definite plans of reorganization.
b. In addition, the area education agency board shall consult with the director of the department of education in the development of surveys and plans. The director of the department of education shall provide assistance to the area education agency boards as requested and shall advise the area education agency boards concerning plans of contiguous area education agencies and the reorganization policies adopted by the state board of education.
2. Completed plans shall be transmitted by the area education agency board to the director of the department of education. [C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §4158; C46, 50, §275.1 – 275.3, 276.5; C54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §275.4] 84 Acts, ch 1078, §3; 85 Acts, ch 212, §21; 92 Acts, ch 1246, §43; 2017 Acts, ch 54, §40; 2018 Acts, ch 1026, §90 Referred to in §275.5, 275.9, 275.15 \n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
7
cases, 1953–2012 · leading case:
Smaha v. Simmons, 60 N.W.2d 100 (Iowa 1953).
Smaha v. Simmons, 60 N.W.2d 100 (Iowa 1953).
· cites it 8× “The section of said chapter 94 upon which reliance is here placed for the argument of repeal by implication is section 5 which amends the election procedure, or section 275.4 of the 1950 Code. The first sentence of section 275.”
Bd. of Directors of Pleasant Hill Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Bd. of Educ., 109 N.W.2d 218 (Iowa 1961).
· cites it 6× “It does not however follow that once a county plan has been adopted, such plan may not be altered without a new study being necessary, as is required by section 275.4. We hold that section 275.4 does not apply to a change in an established county plan.”
East Cent. Cmty. Sch. Dist. v. Mississippi Bend Area Educ. Agency, 813 N.W.2d 741 (Iowa 2012).
· cites it 2× “If the petition “does not comply” with the plans adopted by the board, the board “shall conduct further surveys pursuant to section 275.4 prior to the date set for the hearing upon the petition” and present the results of such surveys at the public hearing.”
Robrock v. Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 94 N.W.2d 101 (Iowa 1959).
· cites it 2× “Section 275.4, 1958 Code of Iowa. By virtue of objections filed and presented by the plaintiffs their lands were removed from the proposed Fredericksburg Community School District plan.”
Jackson v. Smith, 68 N.W.2d 82 (Iowa 1955).
· cites it 6× “The trial court held that inasmuch as chapter 275 of the 1950 Code was enacted subsequent to the provisions of chapter 276, 1950 Code and is made supplemental to that chapter with reference to the procedure to be adopted for the organization of the consolidated school districts,…”
Peterson v. Bd. of Educ., 104 N.W.2d 821 (Iowa 1960).
· cites it 8× “2d 101 , cited by appellants, involves an attachment by a County Board and is not in point. II.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.