Iowa Code » Chapter 3 — STATUTES AND RELATED MATTERS
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 3.2 (2026)

Bill drafting instructions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The legislative council shall, in consultation with the director of the legislative services agency and the Code editor, promulgate rules and instructions for the drafting of legislative bills and resolutions not otherwise in conflict with the provisions of law and the rules of the senate and the house. [C71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §3.2] 2003 Acts, ch 35, §44, 49

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1957–2026 · leading case: State v. Horton, 625 N.W.2d 362 (Iowa 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Horton, 625 N.W.2d 362 (Iowa 2001). · cites it 6× “LaFave, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 3.2(e), at 60 (3d ed.1996) [hereinafter LaFave].”
State v. Rogers, 251 N.W.2d 239 (Iowa 1977). · cites it 4× “Standards Relating to Probation § 3.2, at 44 (Approved Draft, 1970): "3.2 Nature and determination of conditions.”
State v. Pelelo, 247 N.W.2d 221 (Iowa 1976). · cites it 4× “2(c) (Approved Draft 1968), which says: "A motion for change of venue or continuance shall be granted whenever it is determined that because of the dissemination of potentially prejudicial material, there is a reasonable likelihood that in the absence of such relief, a fair…”
State v. Cline, 617 N.W.2d 277 (Iowa 2000). · cites it 2× “La-Fave, Search and Seizure § 3.2(b), at 34-36 (3d ed.1996). Therefore, the State is not limited to the reasons stated by the investigating officer in justifying the challenged search or seizure.”
State v. Freeman, 705 N.W.2d 293 (Iowa 2005). · cites it 2× “LaFave, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 3.2(d) (4th ed. 2004) (stating "[a]n otherwise valid arrest is not rendered illegal by the fact that it turns out the arrestee is innocent").”
State v. Williams, 285 N.W.2d 248 (Iowa 1979). · cites it 2× “2d 519, 520 (Iowa 1972) (quoting ABA Project on Standards for Criminal Justice, Fair Trial and Free Press § 3.2(c) (Approved Draft 1968). Trial court did not so hinder him.”
State v. Johnson, 318 N.W.2d 417 (Iowa 1982). · cites it 2× “Standards Relating to Fair Trial and Free Press § 3.2(e), at 119-20 (App. Draft 1968) (emphasis added).”
State v. Bergmann, 633 N.W.2d 328 (Iowa 2001). “, Criminal Procedure § 3.2(b), at 58-59 (2d ed.1999). This issue prompts us to comment on a recent Supreme Court decision.”
Miller v. Register & Tribune Syndicate, Inc., 336 N.W.2d 709 (Iowa 1983). · cites it 2× “Sections 3.2 and 3.3 of the by-laws of the corporation provide: 3.”
Pollard v. Dist. Court of Woodbury Cnty., 200 N.W.2d 519 (Iowa 1972). · cites it 2× “Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Fair Trial and Free Press, § 3.2(c) (1968): A motion for change of venue or continuance shall be granted whenever it is determined that because of the dissemination of potentially prejudicial material, there is a…”
State v. Casey's Gen. Stores, Inc., 587 N.W.2d 599 (Iowa 1998). “*602 La Fave, Criminal Law § 3.2(f), at 202; accord id. § 3.9(a), at 251.”
State v. Elmore, 201 N.W.2d 443 (Iowa 1972). · cites it 2× “The American Bar Association Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Fair Trial and Free Press, section 3.2(c) (1968), enunciates the principle applicable to cases such as the matter before us: “A motion for change of venue or continuance shall be granted…”
Show all 28 citing cases →
— Iowa Code § 3.2(321) — 1 case
Lyons v. Lange, 447 N.W.2d 407 (Iowa Ct. App. 1989).
— Iowa Code § 3.2(B) — 1 case
Ozolins v. Northwood-Kensett Cmty. Sch. Dist., 40 F. Supp. 2d 1055 (N.D. Iowa 1999).
— Iowa Code § 3.2(b) — 7 cases
State v. Bergmann, 633 N.W.2d 328 (Iowa 2001). “, Criminal Procedure § 3.2(b), at 58-59 (2d ed.1999). This issue prompts us to comment on a recent Supreme Court decision.”
State v. Cline, 617 N.W.2d 277 (Iowa 2000). “La-Fave, Search and Seizure § 3.2(b), at 34-36 (3d ed.1996). Therefore, the State is not limited to the reasons stated by the investigating officer in justifying the challenged search or seizure.”
State v. Gillespie, 619 N.W.2d 345 (Iowa 2000).
State of Iowa v. Daniel Blain Pierce (Iowa Ct. App. 2017).
State of Iowa v. Earnest Jones Hunt, Jr. (Iowa 2022).
— Iowa Code § 3.2(c) — 9 cases
State v. Pelelo, 247 N.W.2d 221 (Iowa 1976). “2(c) (Approved Draft 1968), which says: "A motion for change of venue or continuance shall be granted whenever it is determined that because of the dissemination of potentially prejudicial material, there is a reasonable likelihood that in the absence of such relief, a fair…”
State v. Cline, 617 N.W.2d 277 (Iowa 2000). “La-Fave, Search and Seizure § 3.2(b), at 34-36 (3d ed.1996). Therefore, the State is not limited to the reasons stated by the investigating officer in justifying the challenged search or seizure.”
State v. Williams, 285 N.W.2d 248 (Iowa 1979). “2d 519, 520 (Iowa 1972) (quoting ABA Project on Standards for Criminal Justice, Fair Trial and Free Press § 3.2(c) (Approved Draft 1968). Trial court did not so hinder him.”
Pollard v. Dist. Court of Woodbury Cnty., 200 N.W.2d 519 (Iowa 1972). “Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Fair Trial and Free Press, § 3.2(c) (1968): A motion for change of venue or continuance shall be granted whenever it is determined that because of the dissemination of potentially prejudicial material, there is a…”
State v. Elmore, 201 N.W.2d 443 (Iowa 1972). “The American Bar Association Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Fair Trial and Free Press, section 3.2(c) (1968), enunciates the principle applicable to cases such as the matter before us: “A motion for change of venue or continuance shall be granted…”
— Iowa Code § 3.2(c)(d) — 1 case
State v. Pelelo, 247 N.W.2d 221 (Iowa 1976). “2(c) (Approved Draft 1968), which says: "A motion for change of venue or continuance shall be granted whenever it is determined that because of the dissemination of potentially prejudicial material, there is a reasonable likelihood that in the absence of such relief, a fair…”
— Iowa Code § 3.2(d) — 1 case
State v. Freeman, 705 N.W.2d 293 (Iowa 2005). “LaFave, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 3.2(d) (4th ed. 2004) (stating "[a]n otherwise valid arrest is not rendered illegal by the fact that it turns out the arrestee is innocent").”
— Iowa Code § 3.2(e) — 3 cases
State v. Horton, 625 N.W.2d 362 (Iowa 2001). “LaFave, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 3.2(e), at 60 (3d ed.1996) [hereinafter LaFave].”
State v. Johnson, 318 N.W.2d 417 (Iowa 1982). “Standards Relating to Fair Trial and Free Press § 3.2(e), at 119-20 (App. Draft 1968) (emphasis added).”
State v. Williams, 285 N.W.2d 248 (Iowa 1979). “2d 519, 520 (Iowa 1972) (quoting ABA Project on Standards for Criminal Justice, Fair Trial and Free Press § 3.2(c) (Approved Draft 1968). Trial court did not so hinder him.”
— Iowa Code § 3.2(f) — 2 cases
State v. Rogers, 251 N.W.2d 239 (Iowa 1977). “Standards Relating to Probation § 3.2, at 44 (Approved Draft, 1970): "3.2 Nature and determination of conditions.”
State v. Casey's Gen. Stores, Inc., 587 N.W.2d 599 (Iowa 1998). “*602 La Fave, Criminal Law § 3.2(f), at 202; accord id. § 3.9(a), at 251.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.