Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 3.5 (2026)

Failure of governor to return bill

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When a bill has passed the general assembly, and is not returned by the governor within three days as provided in the Constitution, it shall be authenticated by the secretary of state endorsing thereon: This bill, having remained with the governor three days (Sunday excepted), the general assembly being in session, has become a law this ............ day of ................................, ............ ...................................., Secretary of State. [C51, §18; R60, §21; C73, §30; C97, §33; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §51; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §3.5] Iowa Constitution, Art. III, §16

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: Cosgrove v. State, 304 N.W.2d 184 (Iowa 1981).
Cosgrove v. State, 304 N.W.2d 184 (Iowa 1981). · cites it 6× “[2] See generally ABA Standards, The Defense Function §§ 3.5, 6.2(c) (1971). Note that the commentary to section 3.”
Anderson v. Douglas & Lomason Co., 540 N.W.2d 277 (Iowa 1995). “If it seems fair to the courts to enforce a promise when the promisor has received the desired equivalent, even though the one rendering it knew nothing of the promise and rendered the service from other motives, there is no sufficient reason for refusing to call that…”
State v. Radeke, 444 N.W.2d 476 (Iowa 1989). “Scott, Handbook on *479 Criminal Law § 3.5(f), at 226 (2d ed. 1986). The evidence of deception, assault and defendant’s desire to have sex are circumstances from which the jury could infer an intent to commit sexual abuse.”
State v. Paulsen, 286 N.W.2d 157 (Iowa 1979). · cites it 2× “See also ABA Standards Relating to the Prosecution Function § 3.5 (1971). The prosecutor is barred from expressing opinions on the facts and from attempting to influence the grand jury's action.”
Aalbers v. Iowa Dep't of Job Serv., 431 N.W.2d 330 (Iowa 1988). · cites it 2× “The first, section 3.5, provides: The Union in its behalf and on behalf of the employees agrees that during the life of this Agreement, there shall be no strikes, slowdowns, refusals to or interferences with work, sympathy strikes or refusals to work, or picketing by the Union…”
Harker's Distrib., Inc. v. Reinhart Foodservice, L.L.C., 597 F. Supp. 2d 926 (N.D. Iowa 2009). · cites it 2× “The Accountants shall be engaged by the Sellers and the Buyer regarding the Advance Earn-Out Schedule or the Earn-Out Schedule, as applicable, based upon the written submissions of the Sellers and the Buyer, and the Accountants may, but shall not be required to, audit the…”
Jacobsen v. Dep't of Transp., 332 F. Supp. 2d 1217 (N.D. Iowa 2004). · cites it 2× “§ 36 Section 3.5 defines accessible route as “A continuous unobstructed path connecting all accessible elements and spaces of a building or facility.”
West Liberty Tel. Co. v. Coppercom, Inc., 805 F. Supp. 2d 669 (S.D. Iowa 2009). · cites it 4× “) CopperCom also appears in the Transfer Agreement in Section 3.5, in reference to CopperCom’s duty to “use its best efforts to obtain any and all such consents, approvals and novations [of contracts] before and after Closing.”
Williams v. State, 280 N.W.2d 406 (Iowa 1979). “He also asks that we adopt ABA Standards Relating to Sentencing Alternatives and Procedures, § 3.5 (approved draft, 1968). But we think neither reversal of Herman nor adoption of the ABA standard would result in the credit he seeks on his sentence.”
Nielsen v. Nielsen, 445 N.W.2d 780 (Iowa 1989). “212(2) determines the quantity of the decedent’s personal property which shall be set aside for the surviving spouse, section 633.”
State of Iowa v. Frederick Lee Hawkins III (Iowa 2025). · cites it 4× “, Handbook on Criminal Law § 3.5(f), at 226 (2d ed. 1986))). With respect to circumstantial evidence probative of specific intent to commit sexual abuse, we may consider the “facts surrounding the assault.”
State of Iowa v. Kadin Jeffrey Miller (Iowa 2024). · cites it 2× “, Criminal Law § 3.5(f), at 226 (2d ed. 1986) [hereinafter LaFave & Scott, Criminal Law]), a defendant’s intent is “rarely capable of direct proof” and instead generally must be shown by circumstantial evidence, State v.”
— Iowa Code § 3.5(b) — 2 cases
— Iowa Code § 3.5(e) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 3.5(f) — 8 cases
State v. Radeke, 444 N.W.2d 476 (Iowa 1989). “Scott, Handbook on *479 Criminal Law § 3.5(f), at 226 (2d ed. 1986). The evidence of deception, assault and defendant’s desire to have sex are circumstances from which the jury could infer an intent to commit sexual abuse.”
Harker's Distrib., Inc. v. Reinhart Foodservice, L.L.C., 597 F. Supp. 2d 926 (N.D. Iowa 2009). “The Accountants shall be engaged by the Sellers and the Buyer regarding the Advance Earn-Out Schedule or the Earn-Out Schedule, as applicable, based upon the written submissions of the Sellers and the Buyer, and the Accountants may, but shall not be required to, audit the…”
State of Iowa v. Frederick Lee Hawkins III (Iowa 2025). “, Handbook on Criminal Law § 3.5(f), at 226 (2d ed. 1986))). With respect to circumstantial evidence probative of specific intent to commit sexual abuse, we may consider the “facts surrounding the assault.”
State of Iowa v. Kadin Jeffrey Miller (Iowa 2024). “, Criminal Law § 3.5(f), at 226 (2d ed. 1986) [hereinafter LaFave & Scott, Criminal Law]), a defendant’s intent is “rarely capable of direct proof” and instead generally must be shown by circumstantial evidence, State v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.