Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 3.6 (2026)

Acts — where deposited — nullification resolutions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. The original Acts of the general assembly shall be deposited with and kept by the secretary of state.

2. The secretary of state shall submit to the administrative code editor a copy of any resolution nullifying an administrative rule which is passed by the general assembly pursuant to Article III, section 40 of the Constitution of the State of Iowa. [C51, §19; R60, §22; C73, §31; C97, §34; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §52; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §3.6] 91 Acts, ch 42, §1; 2019 Acts, ch 24, §104 \n

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1946–2011 · leading case: State of Iowa v. Alan Lee Watts, Jr., 801 N.W.2d 845 (Iowa 2011).
State of Iowa v. Alan Lee Watts, Jr., 801 N.W.2d 845 (Iowa 2011). · cites it 3× “LaFave, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 3.6(b), at 311 (4th ed.2004) [hereinafter LaFave] (stating that “the courts have found probable cause to search when the distinctive odor of marijuana is found emanating from a particular place”) (citing cases).”
State v. Kubit, 627 N.W.2d 914 (Iowa 2001). · cites it 4× “Moreover, when the officers waited until Kubit actually answered the door and stepped out—there was no longer any right or necessity to forcibly enter to find a suspect.”
Schaer v. Webster Cnty., 644 N.W.2d 327 (Iowa 2002). “2d 910, 913 (Iowa 1969); I Farnsworth, § 3.6, at 192-94. The misunderstandings of the parties must be reasonable under the circumstances to support a finding of a lack of mutual assent.”
Helmke v. Bd. of Adj., City of Ruthven, 418 N.W.2d 346 (Iowa 1988). · cites it 2× “NOTES [1] The board also cited as a third ground the "essential services" exception of article V, § 3.6. The parties stipulated before trial, however, that a permit for the building could not be upheld on that ground under this record.”
Carlton v. Grimes, 23 N.W.2d 883 (Iowa 1946). · cites it 2× “” This is probably done under authority of section 52, Code, 1939 (section 3.6, Code, 1946), which provides that “the original acts of the general assembly .”
Isu Veterinary Servs. Corp. v. Reimer, 779 F. Supp. 2d 970 (S.D. Iowa 2011). · cites it 2× “Section 3.6 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: (b) In consideration for entering into the non-competition and confidentiality agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and as additional consideration for Employee’s employment under this…”
Meier v. Fam. Dollar Servs., Inc., 443 F. Supp. 2d 1036 (N.D. Iowa 2006). “Asnejo, admitted that Meier suffered from a “hidden” disability that was not necessarily obvious to others like a deformed or missing limb would be. According to ADA protocol, “[i]f a job applicant or employee has a ‘hidden’ disability .”
— Iowa Code § 3.6(b) — 2 cases
State of Iowa v. Alan Lee Watts, Jr., 801 N.W.2d 845 (Iowa 2011). “LaFave, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 3.6(b), at 311 (4th ed.2004) [hereinafter LaFave] (stating that “the courts have found probable cause to search when the distinctive odor of marijuana is found emanating from a particular place”) (citing cases).”
State v. Kubit, 627 N.W.2d 914 (Iowa 2001). “Moreover, when the officers waited until Kubit actually answered the door and stepped out—there was no longer any right or necessity to forcibly enter to find a suspect.”
— Iowa Code § 3.6(d) — 1 case
State v. Kubit, 627 N.W.2d 914 (Iowa 2001). “Moreover, when the officers waited until Kubit actually answered the door and stepped out—there was no longer any right or necessity to forcibly enter to find a suspect.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.