Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 327G.32 (2026)

Blocking highway crossing

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. A railroad corporation or its employees shall not operate a train in such a manner as to prevent vehicular use of a highway, street, or alley for a period of time in excess of ten minutes except in any of the following circumstances:

a. When necessary to comply with signals affecting the safety of the movement of trains.

b. When necessary to avoid striking an object or person on the track.

c. When the train is disabled.

d. When necessary to comply with governmental safety regulations including but not limited to speed ordinances and speed regulations.\n\nTue Dec 09 22:15:06 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 327G (33, 0) 7 RAILROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY, CROSSINGS, TRACKS, AND FENCING, §327G.62\n\n 2. a. An officer or employee of a railroad corporation violating a provision of this section is, upon conviction, subject to a schedule “two” penalty under section 327C.5.

b. An employee is not guilty of a violation if the employee’s action was necessary to comply with the direct order or instructions of a railroad corporation or its supervisors. Guilt is then with the railroad corporation.

3. Other portions of this section notwithstanding, a political subdivision may pass an ordinance regulating the length of time a specific crossing may be blocked if the political subdivision demonstrates that an ordinance is necessary for public safety or convenience. If an ordinance is passed, the political subdivision shall, within thirty days of the effective date of the ordinance, notify the department and the railroad corporation using the crossing affected by the ordinance. The ordinance does not become effective unless the department and the railroad corporation are notified within thirty days. The ordinance becomes effective thirty days after notification unless a person files an objection to the ordinance with the department. If an objection is filed, the department shall notify the department of inspections, appeals, and licensing which shall hold a hearing. After a hearing by the department of inspections, appeals, and licensing, the state department of transportation may disapprove the ordinance if public safety or convenience does not require the ordinance. The decision of the state department of transportation is final agency action. The ordinance approved by the political subdivision is prima facie evidence that the ordinance is adopted to preserve public safety or convenience.

4. The department of inspections, appeals, and licensing when considering rebuttal evidence shall weigh the benefits accruing to the political subdivision as they affect the general public use compared to the burden placed on the railroad operation. Public safety or convenience may include, but is not limited to, high traffic density at a specific crossing of a main artery or interference with the flow of authorized emergency vehicles.

5. A resolution regulating the length of time a specific crossing may be blocked, which was adopted before July 1, 1989, is an ordinance for the purposes of this section. [C77, 79, 81, §327G.32; 81 Acts, ch 22, §20, 22] 85 Acts, ch 195, §39; 89 Acts, ch 39, §4, 5; 89 Acts, ch 273, §37; 2010 Acts, ch 1061, §180; 2016 Acts, ch 1073, §111; 2023 Acts, ch 19, §2005 \n 327G.33 through 327G.60 Reserved.\n\n SUBCHAPTER II PRIVATE BUILDINGS AND SPUR TRACKS \n

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1982–2011 · leading case: Driesen v. Iowa, Chicago & E. Rr Corp., 777 F. Supp. 2d 1143 (N.D. Iowa 2011).
Driesen v. Iowa, Chicago & E. Rr Corp., 777 F. Supp. 2d 1143 (N.D. Iowa 2011). · cites it 8× “This Court concurs with these courts and concludes the subject matter of Iowa Code § 327G.32 and Spencer City Code § 7-7-3 is the movement of trains through grade crossings.”
Soo Line R.R. v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 521 N.W.2d 685 (Iowa 1994). “See Iowa Code § 327G.32 (1991) (railroad may not block a highway crossing more than ten minutes); 49 C.”
Chicago & Nw. Transp. Co. v. Iowa Transp. Reg. Bd., 322 N.W.2d 273 (Iowa 1982). “The city fathers responded to ensuing complaints from their constituents by passing an ordinance, pursuant to Iowa Code § 327G.32 (1979), limiting the blockage of the streets to a maximum of five minutes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.