1. If a railroad easement is extinguished under section 327G.76, the property shall pass to
the owners of the adjacent property at the time of abandonment. If there are different owners
on either side, each owner will take to the center of the right-of-way. Section 614.24 which
requires the filing of a verified claim does not apply to rights granted under this subsection.
2. An adjoining property owner may perfect title under subsection 1 by filing an
affidavit of ownership with the county recorder. The affidavit shall include the name of the
adjoining property owner, a description of the property, the present name of the railroad,
the jurisdiction, docket number, and date of order authorizing the railroad to terminate
service, and the approximate date the track materials on the right-of-way were removed. A
copy of the affidavit must be mailed by the landowner by certified mail to the railroad. The
landowner shall pay taxes on the right-of-way from the date the affidavit is filed.
3. Utility facilities located on abandoned railroad right-of-way shall remain on the
right-of-way subject to payment by the utility of the fair market value of an easement for the
facilities. The utility shall, within sixty days from the time the property is transferred from
the railroad, extend a written offer to the landowner to purchase the easement at fair market
value. The landowner shall accept or reject the utility’s offer within sixty days from the time
of receipt. If a disagreement arises between the parties concerning the price or other terms
of the transaction, either party may make written application to a compensation commission
as established pursuant to chapter 6B to resolve the disagreement. This application shall be
made within sixty days from the time the landowner’s response is served upon the utility.
The compensation commission shall hear the controversy and make a final determination
of the fair market value of the easement and the other terms of the transaction which were
in dispute within ninety days after the application is filed. All correspondence shall be by
certified mail.
[C73, §1260; C97, §2015; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §7862; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75,
§473.2; C77, 79, 81, §327G.77; 81 Acts, ch 22, §22]
83 Acts, ch 121, §6
Referred to in §327G.78
\n
Notes of Decisions
Rasmuson v. United States, 91 Fed. Cl. 204 (Fed. Cl. 2010).
“2d 673, 675-76 (Iowa 1961); see also Iowa Code § 327G.77 (2009)). Second, Plaintiffs have failed to supply “evidence establishing or even suggesting” that the claims of some potential class members are too small to make individual litigation worthwhile.”
Phipps v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 674 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
· cites it 4× “McAllister, Claims 2, 4, 5, 8, and 9, respectively, adjoined the railroad corridor, such that, upon the cessation of the alleged easement for railroad purposes, the railroad corridor land would pass to the owners of these adjoining parcels pursuant to Iowa Code § 327G.77. 8…”
Butler v. Hoover Nature Trail, Inc., 530 N.W.2d 85 (Iowa Ct. App. 1994).
“Iowa Code § 327G.77. To establish title to a right-of-way as an adjacent property owner, however, it must be shown that the railroad had only an easement in the property.”
Burgess v. United States, 109 Fed. Cl. 223 (Fed. Cl. 2013).
“2d at 736 (suggesting that this result is dictated by Iowa Code § 327G.77). Indeed, the Federal Circuit treated the differences between trails and rails as self-evident in another Trails Act ease, Toews v.”
McClurg Fam. Farm, LLC v. United States, 115 Fed. Cl. 1 (Fed. Cl. 2014).
“If the department of transportation does not acquire the line and the railway company does not remove the track materials, the property rights which are extinguished upon cessation of service by the railroad divest one year after the railway obtains the final authorization…”
Notelzah, Inc. v. Destival, 489 N.W.2d 744 (Iowa 1992).
“…Stofer. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS. 1 . Since amended and renumbered. See Iowa Code § 327G.77 (1990).”
Franklin v. Sedore, 450 N.W.2d 849 (Iowa 1990).
“2d 131, 133-34 (Iowa 1985) (under Iowa Code § 327G.77 (1989) abandoned railroad land reverts to the owner of adjacent realty).”
Louis A. Burgess v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2013).
“2d at 736 (suggesting that this result is dictated by Iowa Code § 327G.77). Indeed, the Federal Circuit treated the differences between trails and rails as self- evident in another Trails Act case, Toews v.”
McClurg Fam. Farm, LLC. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2014).
“If the department of transportation does not acquire the line and the railway company does not remove the track materials, the property rights which are extinguished upon cessation of service by the railroad divest one year after the railway obtains the final authorization…”
— Iowa Code § 327G.77(1) — 3 cases
McClurg Fam. Farm, LLC v. United States, 115 Fed. Cl. 1 (Fed. Cl. 2014).
“If the department of transportation does not acquire the line and the railway company does not remove the track materials, the property rights which are extinguished upon cessation of service by the railroad divest one year after the railway obtains the final authorization…”
McClurg Fam. Farm, LLC. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2014).
“If the department of transportation does not acquire the line and the railway company does not remove the track materials, the property rights which are extinguished upon cessation of service by the railroad divest one year after the railway obtains the final authorization…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.