Except as otherwise provided by state or city law, all persons appointed to city office may
be removed by the officer or body making the appointment, but every such removal shall be
by written order. The order shall give the reasons, be filed in the office of the city clerk, and
a copy shall be sent by certified mail to the person removed who, upon request filed with
the clerk within thirty days of the date of mailing the copy, shall be granted a public hearing
before the council on all issues connected with the removal. The hearing shall be held within
thirty days of the date the request is filed, unless the person removed requests a later date.
[C77, 79, 81, §372.15]\n\nTue Dec 09 22:13:41 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 372 (26, 1)
\n
Notes of Decisions
Berent v. City of Iowa City, 738 N.W.2d 193 (Iowa 2007).
· cites it 14× “” The section further provides that the written order “shall give the reasons” for the dismissal.”
Bennett v. City of Redfield, 446 N.W.2d 467 (Iowa 1989).
· cites it 14× “The City alleged it had complied with the notice and hearing requirements of Iowa Code section 372.15 (1987). Both parties filed motions for summary judgment urging there were no material disputed facts.”
Waddell v. Brooke, 684 N.W.2d 185 (Iowa 2004).
· cites it 15× “Iowa Code § 372.15 . A removal from office under this section does not require that the removal be for cause.”
Borschel v. City of Perry, 512 N.W.2d 565 (Iowa 1994).
· cites it 2× “It requires a person’s guilt be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal proceedings. Iowa Code § 701.”
LaPeters v. City of Cedar Rapids, 263 N.W.2d 734 (Iowa 1978).
· cites it 2× “We hold that the firing of LaPeters was governed by § 372.15, The Code. It provides: Except as otherwise provided by state or city law, all persons appointed to city office may be removed by the officer or body making the appointment, but every such removal shall be by written…”
Westphal v. City of Council Bluffs, 275 N.W.2d 439 (Iowa 1979).
“(now § 372.15, The Code). Under our view of this case, however, he was not removed within the meaning of that section; he was simply not reappointed.”
Mark A. Baker v. City of Wellman, & Emp. Appeal Bd. (Iowa Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 36× “5 The City failed to (1) give Baker written notice of his termination; (2) give Baker a written statement of the reason(s) for his termination; or (3) give Baker notice of his opportunity to contest the termination in public hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.