1. Except as specifically recognized by or provided in section 461C.6, a holder of land does not owe a duty of care to keep the premises safe for entry or use by others for a recreational purpose or urban deer control, or to give any warning of a dangerous condition, use, structure, or activity on such premises to persons entering for such purposes.
2. Except as specifically recognized by or provided in section 461C.6, a holder of land does not owe a duty of care to others solely because the holder is guiding, directing, supervising, or participating in any recreational purpose or urban deer control undertaken by others on the holder’s land. [C71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §111C.3] C93, §461C.3 2006 Acts, ch 1121, §4; 2013 Acts, ch 128, §3; 2013 Acts, ch 140, §29, 39 Referred to in §461C.5 \n
Notes of Decisions
Est. of Sharon Kahn & Suzanne L. Rowe, as Adm'r of The Est. of Sharon Kahn, & Est. Of Vicki Hodges & Suzanne L. Rowe & Sierra D. Reyes, as Co-Administrators of the Est. of Vicki Hodges v. City of Clermont, Iowa, Fayette Cnty. Conservation Bd., Fayette Cnty., Iowa, & State of Iowa, 22 N.W.3d 252 (Iowa 2025).
· cites it 3× “” With this definition in hand, the State then points to Iowa Code § 461C.3(1), which states that “a holder of land does not owe a duty of care to keep the premises safe for entry or use by others for a recreational purpose .”
Breitenstein v. Peterson, 29 N.W.3d 336 (Iowa Ct. App. 2025).
“The statutes mandate that “[t]he provisions of this chapter shall be construed liberally and broadly in favor of private holders of land to accomplish the purposes of this chapter.”
Iowa Code § 461C.3(1): 2 cases
Est. of Sharon Kahn & Suzanne L. Rowe, as Adm'r of The Est. of Sharon Kahn, & Est. Of Vicki Hodges & Suzanne L. Rowe & Sierra D. Reyes, as Co-Administrators of the Est. of Vicki Hodges v. City of Clermont, Iowa, Fayette Cnty. Conservation Bd., Fayette Cnty., Iowa, & State of Iowa, 22 N.W.3d 252 (Iowa 2025).
“” With this definition in hand, the State then points to Iowa Code § 461C.3(1), which states that “a holder of land does not owe a duty of care to keep the premises safe for entry or use by others for a recreational purpose .”
Breitenstein v. Peterson, 29 N.W.3d 336 (Iowa Ct. App. 2025).
“The statutes mandate that “[t]he provisions of this chapter shall be construed liberally and broadly in favor of private holders of land to accomplish the purposes of this chapter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.