The commissioners shall attend the meeting of the national conference of commissioners
on uniform state laws, or arrange for the attendance of at least one of their number at the
national conference, and both in and out of the national conference they shall do all in their
power to promote uniformity in state laws, upon all subjects where uniformity is deemed
desirable and practicable. The commission shall report to the legislative council of the general
assembly, an account of its transactions, and its advice and recommendations for legislation.
This report shall be printed for presentation to the council. The council shall submit the report
to the speaker of the house and president of the senate who shall forward it to the appropriate
committees of the general assembly for further study. The commission shall bring about as
far as practicable the uniform judicial interpretation of all uniform laws and generally devise
and recommend additional legislation or other or further course of action as shall tend to
accomplish the purposes of this chapter.
[C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §68; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §5.4]
89 Acts, ch 296, §1\n\nTue Dec 09 22:34:41 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 5 (17, 0)
\n
Notes of Decisions
Husinga v. Fed.-Mogul Ignition Co., 519 F. Supp. 2d 929 (S.D. Iowa 2007).
· cites it 34× “at ¶4 , Article V of the 1998 Union Contract, entitled “Seniority” and § 5.4(e) thereof provides: “An employee shall lose his seniority and his employment will be terminated if .”
State v. Kelley, 161 N.W.2d 123 (Iowa 1968).
· cites it 12× “" And at page 146 is this commentary on the foregoing standard: "Section 5.4(a) "For the reasons set forth in the Commentary to section 5.”
State v. Campbell, 294 N.W.2d 803 (Iowa 1980).
· cites it 5× “Your verdict must be unanimous. It is your duty, as jurors, to consult with one another and to deliberate with the view to reaching an agreement, if you can do so without violence to individual judgment.”
Altena v. United Fire & Cas. Co., 422 N.W.2d 485 (Iowa 1988).
· cites it 2× “Kee-ton, Basic Text on Insurance Law § 5.4(b), at 291 (1971). The district court found as a matter of law that Senard intended to injure Gail when he engaged in the various sex acts.”
State v. Hughes, 200 N.W.2d 559 (Iowa 1972).
· cites it 2× “Project on Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Probation, § 5.4(a) (iii). See also Reinmuth v. State, 163 Neb.”
State v. Mulqueen, 188 N.W.2d 360 (Iowa 1971).
· cites it 2× “See The Code 1971, Section 5.4; Sherwood v. Nissen, 179 N.W.”
State v. Hackett, 200 N.W.2d 493 (Iowa 1972).
· cites it 2× “In other respects it also conforms with ABA Standards Relating to Trial by Jury, Approved Draft, § 5.4(a), and commentary at 146-147. See Goff v.”
Deutz-Allis Credit Corp. v. Lynch Farms, Inc., 387 N.W.2d 593 (Iowa 1986).
“Dole, The Fundamentals of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code § 5.4, at 183 (1982) (purchase money security interests have a “privileged status”); 2 A.”
State of Iowa v. Ethan L. Davis (Iowa 2022).
· cites it 2× “18), which significantly conforms with section 5.4(a) of the American Bar Association (ABA) Standards relating to Trial by Jury.”
— Iowa Code § 5.4(a) — 6 cases
State v. Campbell, 294 N.W.2d 803 (Iowa 1980).
“Your verdict must be unanimous. It is your duty, as jurors, to consult with one another and to deliberate with the view to reaching an agreement, if you can do so without violence to individual judgment.”
State v. Kelley, 161 N.W.2d 123 (Iowa 1968).
“" And at page 146 is this commentary on the foregoing standard: "Section 5.4(a) "For the reasons set forth in the Commentary to section 5.”
State v. Hackett, 200 N.W.2d 493 (Iowa 1972).
“In other respects it also conforms with ABA Standards Relating to Trial by Jury, Approved Draft, § 5.4(a), and commentary at 146-147. See Goff v.”
State v. Hughes, 200 N.W.2d 559 (Iowa 1972).
“Project on Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Probation, § 5.4(a) (iii). See also Reinmuth v. State, 163 Neb.”
— Iowa Code § 5.4(a)(iii) — 1 case
State v. Hughes, 200 N.W.2d 559 (Iowa 1972).
“Project on Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Probation, § 5.4(a) (iii). See also Reinmuth v. State, 163 Neb.”
— Iowa Code § 5.4(b) — 4 cases
Altena v. United Fire & Cas. Co., 422 N.W.2d 485 (Iowa 1988).
“Kee-ton, Basic Text on Insurance Law § 5.4(b), at 291 (1971). The district court found as a matter of law that Senard intended to injure Gail when he engaged in the various sex acts.”
State v. Kelley, 161 N.W.2d 123 (Iowa 1968).
“" And at page 146 is this commentary on the foregoing standard: "Section 5.4(a) "For the reasons set forth in the Commentary to section 5.”
State v. Campbell, 294 N.W.2d 803 (Iowa 1980).
“Your verdict must be unanimous. It is your duty, as jurors, to consult with one another and to deliberate with the view to reaching an agreement, if you can do so without violence to individual judgment.”
— Iowa Code § 5.4(d) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 5.4(e) — 1 case
Husinga v. Fed.-Mogul Ignition Co., 519 F. Supp. 2d 929 (S.D. Iowa 2007).
“at ¶4 , Article V of the 1998 Union Contract, entitled “Seniority” and § 5.4(e) thereof provides: “An employee shall lose his seniority and his employment will be terminated if .”
— Iowa Code § 5.4(j) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 5.4(k) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 5.4(l)(a) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.