Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 57.1 (2026)

Standing to bring contest — grounds for contest

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. Elections may be contested under this chapter as follows:

a. The election of any person to any county office, to a seat in either branch of the general assembly, to a state office, to the office of senator or representative in Congress, or to the office of presidential elector may be contested by any eligible person who received votes for the office in question.

b. The outcome of the election on a public measure may be contested by petition of the greater of ten eligible electors or a number of eligible electors equaling one percent of the total number of votes cast upon the public measure; each petitioner must be a person who was entitled to vote on the public measure in question or would have been so entitled if registered to vote.

2. Grounds for contesting an election under this chapter are:

a. Misconduct, fraud or corruption on the part of any election official or of any board of canvassers of sufficient magnitude to change the result of the election.

b. That the incumbent was not eligible to the office in question at the time of election.

c. That prior to the election the incumbent had been duly convicted of a felony, as defined in section 701.7, and that the judgment had not been reversed, annulled, or set aside, nor the incumbent pardoned or restored to the rights of citizenship by the governor under chapter 914, at the time of the election.

d. That the incumbent has given or offered to any elector, or any precinct election official or canvasser of the election, any bribe or reward in money, property, or thing of value, for the purpose of procuring the incumbent’s election.

e. That illegal votes have been received or legal votes rejected at the polls, sufficient to change the result of the election.

f. Any error in any board of canvassers in counting the votes, or in declaring the result of the election, if the error would affect the result.

g. That the public measure or office was not authorized or required by state law to appear on the ballot at the election being contested.

h. Any other cause or allegation which, if sustained, would show that a person other than the incumbent was the person duly elected to the office in question, or would show the outcome of the election on the public measure in question was contrary to the result declared by the board of canvassers. [C51, §339, 341, 368, 380, 387; R60, §569, 571, 598, 610, 617; C73, §692, 718, 730, 737; C97, §1198; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §981; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §57.1; 81 Acts, ch 34, §39] 86 Acts, ch 1112, §3; 2002 Acts, ch 1134, §72, 115 Referred to in §62.5, 388.2A \n

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1951–2026 · leading case: Bauman v. Maple Valley Cmty. Sch. Dist., 649 N.W.2d 9 (Iowa 2002).
Bauman v. Maple Valley Cmty. Sch. Dist., 649 N.W.2d 9 (Iowa 2002). · cites it 2× “The contestants challenged approximately ninety of the total votes cast, on claims that the votes were contrary to Iowa Code section 57.1(e) (providing that an election may be contested on the grounds that “illegal votes have been received or legal votes rejected at the polls,…”
In re (Iowa 2026). · cites it 56× “The particular causes of the contest pursuant to section 57.1, subsection 2. If a cause of the contest is an allegation that illegal votes were received or that legal votes were rejected, a statement shall be included setting forth the names of the persons who are alleged to…”
De Koning v. Mellema, 534 N.W.2d 391 (Iowa 1995). · cites it 2× “See Iowa Code § 57.1 . On December 31, 1992, they concurrently filed a petition or statement to that effect in the clerk of district court’s office, Meiburg v.”
Patton v. Indep. Sch. Dist. of Coggon, 48 N.W.2d 803 (Iowa 1951). · cites it 4× “Section 57.1 states that “the election of any person to any county office, or to a seat in either branch of the general assembly, may be contested by any person eligible to such office * * Section 57.”
Taylor v. Cent. City Cmty. Sch. Dist., 733 N.W.2d 655 (Iowa 2007). “On August 13, 2004, twenty-eight eligible voters in the district filed a notice of intent to contest the election and a request to convene a contest court pursuant to Iowa Code sections 57.1(6) and 62.5. The contest court was subsequently convened pursuant to Iowa Code section…”
Raymond Taylor, Keith Comley, & Vivian Edgerton Vs. Cent. City Cmty. Sch. Dist. (Iowa 2007). “On August 13, 2004, twenty-eight eligible voters in the district filed a notice of intent to contest the election and a request to convene a contest court pursuant to Iowa Code sections 57.1(b) and 62.5. The contest court was subsequently convened pursuant to Iowa Code section…”
— Iowa Code § 57.1(2) — 1 case
In re (Iowa 2026). “The particular causes of the contest pursuant to section 57.1, subsection 2. If a cause of the contest is an allegation that illegal votes were received or that legal votes were rejected, a statement shall be included setting forth the names of the persons who are alleged to…”
— Iowa Code § 57.1(2)(a) — 1 case
In re (Iowa 2026). “The particular causes of the contest pursuant to section 57.1, subsection 2. If a cause of the contest is an allegation that illegal votes were received or that legal votes were rejected, a statement shall be included setting forth the names of the persons who are alleged to…”
— Iowa Code § 57.1(2)(e) — 1 case
In re (Iowa 2026). “The particular causes of the contest pursuant to section 57.1, subsection 2. If a cause of the contest is an allegation that illegal votes were received or that legal votes were rejected, a statement shall be included setting forth the names of the persons who are alleged to…”
— Iowa Code § 57.1(2)(f) — 1 case
In re (Iowa 2026). “The particular causes of the contest pursuant to section 57.1, subsection 2. If a cause of the contest is an allegation that illegal votes were received or that legal votes were rejected, a statement shall be included setting forth the names of the persons who are alleged to…”
— Iowa Code § 57.1(6) — 1 case
Taylor v. Cent. City Cmty. Sch. Dist., 733 N.W.2d 655 (Iowa 2007). “On August 13, 2004, twenty-eight eligible voters in the district filed a notice of intent to contest the election and a request to convene a contest court pursuant to Iowa Code sections 57.1(6) and 62.5. The contest court was subsequently convened pursuant to Iowa Code section…”
— Iowa Code § 57.1(b) — 1 case
Raymond Taylor, Keith Comley, & Vivian Edgerton Vs. Cent. City Cmty. Sch. Dist. (Iowa 2007). “On August 13, 2004, twenty-eight eligible voters in the district filed a notice of intent to contest the election and a request to convene a contest court pursuant to Iowa Code sections 57.1(b) and 62.5. The contest court was subsequently convened pursuant to Iowa Code section…”
— Iowa Code § 57.1(e) — 1 case
Bauman v. Maple Valley Cmty. Sch. Dist., 649 N.W.2d 9 (Iowa 2002). “The contestants challenged approximately ninety of the total votes cast, on claims that the votes were contrary to Iowa Code section 57.1(e) (providing that an election may be contested on the grounds that “illegal votes have been received or legal votes rejected at the polls,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.