Iowa Code
Iowa Code § 622.82 (2026)
Prisoner produced
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A person confined in a penitentiary or jail in the state may, by order of any court of record, be required to be produced for oral examination in the county where the person is imprisoned, and in a criminal case in any county in the state; but in all other cases the person’s examination must be by a deposition. [R60, §4019; C73, §3678; C97, §4670; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §11339; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §622.82]
\nNotes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1981–2020 · leading case: In the Interest of M.D., K.T., G.A., E.A. & S.A., Minor Child., 921 N.W.2d 229 (Iowa 2018).
In the Interest of M.D., K.T., G.A., E.A. & S.A., Minor Child., 921 N.W.2d 229 (Iowa 2018). “It claims a court may only order a person confined in a penitentiary or jail to appear in a civil case to give testimony in a court in the county where the person is imprisoned.”
Webb v. State, 555 N.W.2d 824 (Iowa 1996). “Y and XIV § 1; Iowa Code § 622.82 (1995). Therefore, he claims that the district court erred in requiring him to testify by telephone, and that his postconviction counsel was ineffective in failing to take his deposition, in leading him to believe he would be allowed to attend…”
Myers v. Emke, 476 N.W.2d 84 (Iowa 1991). “In its ruling, the district court stated that it considered Iowa Code section 622.82 and State v. Ryan, 351 N.W.”
In the Interest of J.S., 470 N.W.2d 48 (Iowa Ct. App. 1991). “contends the juvenile court erred and denied him due process by refusing to direct that he be transported from prison so he could attend the termination hearing in person. The juvenile court considered this claim and concluded G.”
State v. Ryan, 351 N.W.2d 186 (Iowa 1984). “Although a trial court may order a person confined in a penitentiary to be produced for oral examination in a criminal case, Iowa Code § 622.82 , and provision is made for the detention of such a person in the county jail, Iowa Code § 356.”
State v. Kile, 313 N.W.2d 558 (Iowa 1981). “Defendant also argues that the victim’s testimony was inadmissible for the reason that he was not brought to court under section 622.82, The Code 1979: A person confined in a penitentiary or jail in the state may, by order of any court of record be required to be produced for…”
In the Interest of A.R., Minor Child (Iowa Ct. App. 2020). “See Iowa Code § 622.82 (2019). The mother was incarcerated at the Iowa Correctional Institution for Women in Mitchellville, which is in Polk County.”
Joel Aguirre, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2014). “In spite of the fact that the right to testify by telephone was granted at his request, Aguirre apparently takes the position that he had no alternative when the trial court denied his writ of habeas corpus ad testifcandum.”
In re B.A. (Iowa Ct. App. 2017). “The IDOC appealed the matter to the Iowa Supreme Court, and that court summarily reversed the juvenile court’s order, citing Iowa Code section 622.82 (2017) and Myers v. Emke, 476 N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.