1. The court of the county in which a will is probated, or in which administration, conservatorship or guardianship is granted, shall have jurisdiction coextensive with the state in the settlement of the estate, and in the sale and distribution thereof.
2. A district judge or a district associate judge has statewide jurisdiction to enter orders in probate matters not requiring notice and hearing, although the judge is not a judge of or present in the district in which the probate matter is pending. The orders shall be made in conformity with the rules of the district in which the probate matter is pending. [R60, §2472; C73, §2319; C97, §3265; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §11825; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, §631.7; C66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §633.13] 83 Acts, ch 186, §10119, 10201; 94 Acts, ch 1122, §2; 2020 Acts, ch 1062, §94 \n
Notes of Decisions
Davis v. Travelers Ins. Co., 196 N.W.2d 526 (Iowa 1972).
· cites it 4× “She asserted Code section 633.13 was controlling and that only Polk County District Court had jurisdiction.”
Corbett v. Stergios, 137 N.W.2d 266 (Iowa 1965).
· cites it 2× “6, Code, 1962, which provides rights of inheritance between a child and parent by adoption shall be the same as those between parent and child born in lawful wedlock, and section 633.13 (the “pretermitted heir statute”) which states that when a testator has a child born after…”
In Re Maske's Est., 55 N.W.2d 474 (Iowa 1952).
· cites it 2× “13, Code, 1950, states that a child born after a will is made, who is unprovided for by any settlement and neither provided for nor mentioned in the will, shall inherit the same interest as though no will had been made and said interest “shall be taken ratably from the interests…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.