Unless the court, for cause shown, determines that the possession of the personal
representative shall continue for a longer period, the personal representative shall deliver
all specifically devised property to the devisees entitled thereto after the expiration of twelve
months from the date of appointment of the personal representative. This section shall
not preclude the court from directing that such delivery be made before such period has
expired, nor shall the personal representative be prevented from delivering such property at
an earlier time.
[C51, §1381 – 1383; R60, §2413 – 2415; C73, §2429 – 2431; C97, §3355 – 3357; C24, 27, 31, 35,
39, §11978 – 11980; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, §635.73 – 635.75; C66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §633.355]
2012 Acts, ch 1123, §8
\n
Notes of Decisions
Matter of Est. of Franzkowiak, 290 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 1980).
“See § 633.355, The Code. The executor’s motion for clarification of jurisdiction is overruled as moot.”
Harold Youngblut v. Leonard Youngblut (Iowa 2020).
“§ 633.355. Allowing a separate, subsequent challenge to the will’s plan of distribution based on a theory of tortious interference could defeat this purpose.”
Elias v. Firstar Bank of Council Bluffs Ex Rel. Faust, 503 N.W.2d 417 (Iowa 1993).
· cites it 2× “A further exception is provided in Iowa Code section 633.355, which requires the personal representative to deliver specifically devised or bequeathed property to the distributee within nine months of appointment unless otherwise ordered by the court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.