1. Officials, except for members of boards or commissions as defined under section 7E.4, state employees, and legislative employees shall not receive, directly or indirectly, or enter into any express or implied agreement for, any compensation, in whatever form, for the appearance or rendition of services by that person or another against the interest of the state in relation to any case, proceeding, application, or other matter before any state agency, any court of the state of Iowa, any federal court, or any federal bureau, agency, commission, or department.
2. A person who is an official, but who is not subject to the requirements of subsection 1, shall not receive, directly or indirectly, or enter into any agreement, express or implied, for any compensation, in whatever form, for the appearance or rendition of services by that person or another against the interest of the state in relation to any case, proceeding, application, or other matter before the subunit of a department or independent agency in\n\nTue Dec 09 22:30:34 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 68B (42, 1) 9 GOVERNMENT ETHICS AND LOBBYING, §68B.9\n\nwhich the person serves, is employed, or with which the person has substantial and regular contact as part of the person’s duties. [C71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §68B.6] 92 Acts, ch 1228, §6; 93 Acts, ch 163, §5; 2004 Acts, ch 1091, §8 Referred to in §13.2, 13B.4, 68B.34 \n
Notes of Decisions
Triplett v. Azordegan, 421 F. Supp. 998 (N.D. Iowa 1976).
· cites it 29× “On September 2, 1976, defendant moved the court to reconsider its order approving withdrawal and assignment of substitute counsel, citing conflict of interest in violation of Iowa Code § 68B.6 (1975) on the part of substitute counsel.”
Salsbury Labs. v. Iowa Dep't of Env't Quality, 276 N.W.2d 830 (Iowa 1979).
“§§ 68B.6, .8, The Code 1977. *833 District court declined to lay down any guidelines for Baumann other than that the subpoena “requires witnesses to testify unless constitutional, statutory, or other grounds may exist with respect to the qualification of a witness for his…”
Borlin v. Civil Serv. Com'n of Council Bluffs, 338 N.W.2d 146 (Iowa 1983).
· cites it 2× “See also Iowa Code § 68B.6. Taken together the foregoing statutes disclose a pronounced sensitivity to the conflicts that can arise between the official and private affairs of public officials.”
Cook v. State, 476 N.W.2d 617 (Iowa 1991).
· cites it 2× “The State also challenges the admission of evidence by one of plaintiff’s expert witnesses on the ground that that witness, as State Medical Examiner, should not have been permitted to testify against the interests of the State by reason of Iowa Code section 68B.6 (1989). This…”
Loney v. Scurr, 494 F. Supp. 928 (S.D. Iowa 1980).
· cites it 2× “This fact disposes of defendants’ suggestion that an award of attorney’s fees in this case would result in a violation of § 68B.6, Code of Iowa (1979), which provides that: No official, employee, or legislative employee [of the State of Iowa] shall receive, directly or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.