1. A sex offender shall appear in person in the county of principal residence after the offender was initially required to register, to verify residence, employment, and attendance as a student, to allow the sheriff to photograph the offender, and to verify the accuracy of other relevant information during the following time periods after the initial registration:
a. For a sex offender classified as a tier I offender, every year.
b. For a sex offender classified as a tier II offender, every six months.
c. For a sex offender classified as a tier III offender, every three months.
2. A sheriff may require a sex offender to appear in person more frequently than provided in subsection 1 to verify relevant information if good cause is shown. The circumstances under which more frequent appearances are required shall be reasonable, documented by the sheriff, and provided to the offender and the department in writing. Any modification to such requirement shall also be provided to the sex offender and the department in writing.
3. a. At least thirty days prior to an appearance for the verification of relevant information as required by this section, the department shall mail notification of the required appearance to each reported residence of the sex offender. The department shall not be required to mail notification to any sex offender if the residence described or listed in the sex offender’s relevant information is insufficient for the delivery of mail.
b. The notice shall state that the sex offender shall appear in person in the county of principal residence on or before a date specified in the notice to verify and update relevant information. The notice shall not be forwarded to another address and shall be returned to the department if the sex offender no longer resides at the address.
4. A photograph of the sex offender shall be updated, at a minimum, annually. The sheriff shall send the updated photograph to the department using procedures established by the department by rule within five business days of the photograph being taken and the department shall post the updated photograph on the sex offender registry’s internet site. The sheriff may require the sex offender to submit to being photographed, fingerprinted, or\n\nTue Dec 09 21:57:01 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 692A (37, 1) §692A.108, SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY 12\n\npalm printed, more than once per year during any required appearance to verify relevant information.
5. The sheriff may make a reasonable modification to the date requiring a sex offender to make an appearance based on exigent circumstances including man-made or natural disasters. The sheriff shall notify the department of any modification using procedures established by the department by rule.
6. A waiver of the next immediate in-person verification pursuant to this section may be granted at the discretion of the sheriff, if the sex offender appears in person at the sheriff’s office because of changes to relevant information pursuant to section 692A.104 or 692A.105, and if the in-person verification pursuant to this section is within thirty days of such in-person appearance. If a waiver is granted, the sheriff shall notify the department of granting the waiver. 2009 Acts, ch 119, §8 Referred to in §692A.104, 692A.107, 692A.111 \n
Notes of Decisions
State of Iowa v. Joshua Kelly Uranga (Iowa Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 14× “104 provides for a five-day “grace period” from certain triggering events, section 692A.108 does not. So for November 2016, he had a duty to appear by November 30th or face criminal charges for failure to do so.”
State of Iowa v. Matthew John Kippe (Iowa Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 7× “Kippe argues that the third element misstates the law because nothing in Iowa Code section 692A.108 required him to verify his registration in November.”
State of Iowa v. Ronald Eugene Cooley (Iowa 2025).
· cites it 3× “A related section, § 692A.108, is the only provision in chapter 692A that confers authority to local sheriffs to waive an in-person requirement, and only then for a verification of existing information after the offender has previously appeared in person: A waiver of the next…”
State of Iowa v. Byron Joel Wiles (Iowa Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 4× “” See Iowa Code §§ 692A.108, .101(23)(a)(17). 7 Additionally, if this was his belief, it is undercut by the fact he re-registered other unchanged information.”
Nathan Daniel Olsen v. State of Iowa (Iowa 2024).
· cites it 2× “§ 692A.108(1) (“A sex offender shall appear in person in the county of principal residence after the offender was initially required to register, to verify residence, employment, and attendance as a student, to allow the sheriff to photograph the offender, and to verify the…”
Kurt Alan Olson v. State of Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2026).
· cites it 2× “Olson, we previously discussed that there would be a stipulation relative to the elements of enhancement with regard to each of those five counts, those dealing with [Iowa Code] section 692A.108 [(2016)], regarding the registry, as well as a previous conviction of an offense .”
Ron Fortune v. State of Iowa (Iowa 2021).
“§ 692A.108(1)(c). Because his offense was against a minor, he is subject to the exclusion zone restrictions set forth in Iowa Code section 692A.”
State of Iowa v. Gary Lee Jensen (Iowa Ct. App. 2022).
“§ 692A.108(1)(c). The first violation of that statutes is an aggravated misdemeanor; the second is a class “D” felony.”
— Iowa Code § 692A.108(1) — 3 cases
State of Iowa v. Joshua Kelly Uranga (Iowa Ct. App. 2020).
“104 provides for a five-day “grace period” from certain triggering events, section 692A.108 does not. So for November 2016, he had a duty to appear by November 30th or face criminal charges for failure to do so.”
Nathan Daniel Olsen v. State of Iowa (Iowa 2024).
“§ 692A.108(1) (“A sex offender shall appear in person in the county of principal residence after the offender was initially required to register, to verify residence, employment, and attendance as a student, to allow the sheriff to photograph the offender, and to verify the…”
— Iowa Code § 692A.108(1)(c) — 9 cases
State of Iowa v. Joshua Kelly Uranga (Iowa Ct. App. 2020).
“104 provides for a five-day “grace period” from certain triggering events, section 692A.108 does not. So for November 2016, he had a duty to appear by November 30th or face criminal charges for failure to do so.”
State of Iowa v. Matthew John Kippe (Iowa Ct. App. 2020).
“Kippe argues that the third element misstates the law because nothing in Iowa Code section 692A.108 required him to verify his registration in November.”
— Iowa Code § 692A.108(5) — 1 case
State of Iowa v. Joshua Kelly Uranga (Iowa Ct. App. 2020).
“104 provides for a five-day “grace period” from certain triggering events, section 692A.108 does not. So for November 2016, he had a duty to appear by November 30th or face criminal charges for failure to do so.”
— Iowa Code § 692A.108(6) — 1 case
State of Iowa v. Ronald Eugene Cooley (Iowa 2025).
“A related section, § 692A.108, is the only provision in chapter 692A that confers authority to local sheriffs to waive an in-person requirement, and only then for a verification of existing information after the offender has previously appeared in person: A waiver of the next…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.