Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 7.2 (2026)

Journal

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The governor shall cause a journal to be kept in the executive office, in which a record shall be made of each official act as done, except if in cases of emergency an act is done away from the office, such entry shall be made as soon thereafter as may be. The governor shall cause a like military record to be kept of the acts done as commander in chief. [C73, §56, 57; C97, §61; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §79; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §7.2]

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2022 · leading case: State of Iowa v. Jesse Michael Gaskins, 866 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2015).
State of Iowa v. Jesse Michael Gaskins, 866 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2015). · cites it 4× “LaFave, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 7.2(b), at 735 (5th ed. 2012) [hereinafter LaFave] (quoting Lewis R.”
State of Iowa v. Christopher George Storm, 898 N.W.2d 140 (Iowa 2017). · cites it 2× “LaFave, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 7.2(b), at 735 (5th ed. 2012) (quoting Lewis R.”
State v. Cullor, 315 N.W.2d 808 (Iowa 1982). · cites it 5× “LaFave, supra, § 7.2, at 519-21. We find nothing in the record here to indicate Bolin knew the automobile would be found at defendant’s home; the last time it had been *813 seen, a few hours earlier, it was in a different town.”
Shivvers v. Hertz Farm Mgmt., Inc., 595 N.W.2d 476 (Iowa 1999). · cites it 4× “Smith, Legal Malpractice § 7.2, at 491 (4th ed.1996) [hereinafter Mallen & Smith].”
Gen. Elec. Capital Corp. v. Com. Servs. Grp., Inc., 485 F. Supp. 2d 1015 (N.D. Iowa 2007). · cites it 4× “GE Capital alleges, further, that CSG has, despite repeated demands, refused to perform its obligations under Section 7.2 of the Collection Agreement and has damaged GE Capital, inter alia, by remitting only approximately $19,000 out of an amount due substantially in excess of…”
Pro Edge L.P. v. Gue, 377 F. Supp. 2d 694 (N.D. Iowa 2005). · cites it 2× “Further, the plaintiffs argue that section 7.2(b) cannot be properly read as requiring termination of all employment agreements existing between Pro Edge, Ltd.”
State v. Crawley, 633 N.W.2d 802 (Iowa 2001). “Israel, Criminal Procedure § 7.2(c) (1982))). Indeed, it has been noted that “[a]ll federal circuits passing on the question held or *805 opined that the refusal to submit a handwriting exemplar was admissible as evidence of consciousness of guilt” except for the seventh…”
Potter v. Oster, 426 N.W.2d 148 (Iowa 1988). “85, 86 (1935); see also Hillman, § 7.2, at 157. Rescission is considered an extraordinary remedy, however, and is ordinarily not available to a litigant as a matter of right but only when, in the discretion of the court, it is necessary to obtain equity.”
Bokhoven v. Klinker, 474 N.W.2d 553 (Iowa 1991). “Schwartz, Comparative Negligence § 7.2 (2d ed. 1986); Annotation, Modern Development of Comparative Negligence Doctrine Having Applicability to Negligence Actions Generally, 78 A.”
United States v. O'Connell, 408 F. Supp. 2d 712 (N.D. Iowa 2005). “LaFave, Search & Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 7.2(b), at 554-55 (4th ed.2004) (discussing Carney and Hepperle and concluding that the automobile exception "would seem inapplicable” in a case where "it was apparent the vehicle was inoperable and that it quite…”
Dennis H. Hagenow & Rosalee A. Hagenow v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 846 N.W.2d 373 (Iowa 2014). “1 Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Insurance § 7.2, at 363 (emphasis added). Notably, insurers’ use of other types of defenses to liability goes unchallenged by Professor Widiss and other leading commentators.”
Iowa Beer & Liquor Control Dep't Store 1023 v. Iowa Civil Rights Comm'n, 337 N.W.2d 896 (Iowa Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “§ 7.2(6) (1977). Petitioners argue that the Commission erred in concluding that the department failed to make reasonable accommodation to claimant's disability, and that the district court appropriately found that conclusion to be unsupported by substantial evidence.”
— Iowa Code § 7.2(6) — 1 case
Iowa Beer & Liquor Control Dep't Store 1023 v. Iowa Civil Rights Comm'n, 337 N.W.2d 896 (Iowa Ct. App. 1983). “§ 7.2(6) (1977). Petitioners argue that the Commission erred in concluding that the department failed to make reasonable accommodation to claimant's disability, and that the district court appropriately found that conclusion to be unsupported by substantial evidence.”
— Iowa Code § 7.2(b) — 6 cases
State of Iowa v. Jesse Michael Gaskins, 866 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2015). “LaFave, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 7.2(b), at 735 (5th ed. 2012) [hereinafter LaFave] (quoting Lewis R.”
State of Iowa v. Christopher George Storm, 898 N.W.2d 140 (Iowa 2017). “LaFave, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 7.2(b), at 735 (5th ed. 2012) (quoting Lewis R.”
Pro Edge L.P. v. Gue, 377 F. Supp. 2d 694 (N.D. Iowa 2005). “Further, the plaintiffs argue that section 7.2(b) cannot be properly read as requiring termination of all employment agreements existing between Pro Edge, Ltd.”
United States v. O'Connell, 408 F. Supp. 2d 712 (N.D. Iowa 2005). “LaFave, Search & Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 7.2(b), at 554-55 (4th ed.2004) (discussing Carney and Hepperle and concluding that the automobile exception "would seem inapplicable” in a case where "it was apparent the vehicle was inoperable and that it quite…”
— Iowa Code § 7.2(c) — 1 case
State v. Crawley, 633 N.W.2d 802 (Iowa 2001). “Israel, Criminal Procedure § 7.2(c) (1982))). Indeed, it has been noted that “[a]ll federal circuits passing on the question held or *805 opined that the refusal to submit a handwriting exemplar was admissible as evidence of consciousness of guilt” except for the seventh…”
— Iowa Code § 7.2(d) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 7.2(i) — 1 case
Gen. Elec. Capital Corp. v. Com. Servs. Grp., Inc., 485 F. Supp. 2d 1015 (N.D. Iowa 2007). “GE Capital alleges, further, that CSG has, despite repeated demands, refused to perform its obligations under Section 7.2 of the Collection Agreement and has damaged GE Capital, inter alia, by remitting only approximately $19,000 out of an amount due substantially in excess of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.