The Iowa department of corrections is established to be responsible for the control, treatment, and rehabilitation of offenders committed under law to the following institutions:
1. Iowa correctional institution for women.
2. Anamosa state penitentiary.
3. Iowa state penitentiary.
4. Iowa medical and classification center.
5. North central correctional facility at Rockwell City.
6. Mount Pleasant correctional facility.
7. Clarinda correctional facility.
8. Newton correctional facility.
9. Fort Dodge correctional facility.
10. Rehabilitation camps.
11. Other institutions related to an institution in subsections 1 through 10 but not attached to the campus of the main institution as program developments require.
12. Community-based corrections facilities. 83 Acts, ch 96, §3, 159 CS83, §217A.2 84 Acts, ch 1184, §1; 84 Acts, ch 1219, §9; 85 Acts, ch 21, §13, 54 CS85, §246.102 C93, §904.102 97 Acts, ch 130, §2 – 4; 2024 Acts, ch 1182, §58 Referred to in §7E.5, 135.11, 148C.4, 152.1, 263.22, 266.37, 321J.22, 357H.1, 904.101, 904.103, 904.108, 904.301, 904.318, 904.507A \n
Notes of Decisions
State of Iowa v. Curtis Vance Halverson, 857 N.W.2d 632 (Iowa 2015).
· cites it 4× “” At the outset, Iowa Code section 904.102 lists the institutions in which the IDOC is “responsible for the control, treatment, and rehabilitation of offenders.”
Raas v. State, 729 N.W.2d 444 (Iowa 2007).
· cites it 4× “Under Iowa Code section 904.102(4) (2003), [t]he Iowa department of corrections is established to be responsible for the control, treatment, and rehabilitation of offenders committed under law to the following institutions: [[Image here]] 4.”
In Re the Det. of Shaffer, 769 N.W.2d 169 (Iowa 2009).
· cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 904.102 . Each offender committed to the custody of the department is eligible to earn a reduction of sentence as provided by statute, id.”
Maghee v. State, 773 N.W.2d 228 (Iowa 2009).
“§ 904.102 (establishing the department of corrections).”
Pargo v. Elliott, 894 F. Supp. 1243 (S.D. Iowa 1995).
· cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 904.102 (1993). The DOC states as its mission: “To protect the public through the community based and institutional supervision of offenders sentenced to the Department while providing a safe and humane environment and programming that encourages responsible behavior.”
State v. Rodenburg, 562 N.W.2d 186 (Iowa 1997).
· cites it 2× “; accord Iowa Code § 904.102 . The Cap-per court paid particular attention to the fact that IMCC was a correctional facility within the meaning of section 903A.”
State v. Capper, 539 N.W.2d 361 (Iowa 1995).
“§§ 904.102,.201. Persons may be admitted at the institution who are referred to the institution by the courts.”
State of Iowa v. Mark Lee Jackson (Iowa Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 6× “8 listed in section 904.102. Id. at 771 . The language employed indicates the institutions enumerated in section 904.”
Eric Antonio Wayman, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 4× “In Knipe, our supreme court found “detention facility or penal institution” includes, at a minimum, the institutions listed in section 904.102. Id. at 771 . The language employed indicates the institutions enumerated in section 904.”
Eric Antonio Wayman, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 4× “In Knipe, our supreme court found “detention facility or penal institution” includes, at a minimum, the institutions listed in section 904.102. Id. at 771 . The language employed indicates the institutions enumerated in section 904.”
State of Iowa v. Edward N. Shorter (Iowa Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “Iowa Code section 904.102 provides the Iowa Department of Corrections is “responsible for the control, treatment, and rehabilitation of offenders committed under law to the following institutions: .”
— Iowa Code § 904.102(4) — 2 cases
Raas v. State, 729 N.W.2d 444 (Iowa 2007).
“Under Iowa Code section 904.102(4) (2003), [t]he Iowa department of corrections is established to be responsible for the control, treatment, and rehabilitation of offenders committed under law to the following institutions: [[Image here]] 4.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.